this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Interesting Global News

2590 readers
431 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative fifth circuit overturns EPA’s ban prohibiting Inhance from using manufacturing process creating toxic compound

Archived version: https://archive.ph/xuz0R

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Imagine working for Inhance and high-fiving your coworkers because a court said it's legal for you to continue contaminating humans and the environment with a harmful chemical.

What kind of sick motherfucker sleeps well after that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Just another day in America.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be fair if you actually read it the EPA invoked the wrong legislation, it should be banned but they didn't ban in a legal manner

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not really. The argument came down to the Section 5 definition of "new", since other arguments were ignored as moot. It was a typical pro business decision that argued on semantics instead of law.

The court even signaled that they would reject it under Section 6 if EPA were to use it due to the need "to weigh the costs to businesses and the overall economy before shutting down an ongoing manufacturing process".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they have had this process for decades it's not new though, the information about the harms is new. You could argue the EPA doesn't have enough power when something is provably toxic but this ruling isn't surprising, especially when it would create significant case law

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All you have to do is lie about producing toxic chemicals for as long as possible. Checkmate epa!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Gigabrain strat 🧠

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

doomer "Sure appreciate that the government functions just well enough to make it illegal for it to function at all..."

freedom-and-democracy "Sure thing bro!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Dollars over lives…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Conservative fifth circuit is the headline, Grauniad. Don’t bury it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh thank god, I was worried that public health would cause my investments to grow 0.01% slower.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

SCOTUS: nobody is forcing you to purchase from businesses that use these plastic containers. Therefore nobody has standing to sue