She should just go ahead and be Oliver Coleman in order to prove her point. She's completely capable of portraying "him" convincingly, and making him lovable as well. I'd watch anything he was in, just like I watch whatever she's in.
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ghazi
685 readers
2 users here now
A community for progressive issues, social justice and LGBT+ causes in media, gaming, entertainment and tech.
Official replacement for Reddit's r/GamerGhazi
Content should be articles, video essays, podcasts about topics relevant to the forum. No memes, single images or tweets/toots/... please!
Community rules:
Be respectful and civil with each other. Don't be a jerk. There is a real human being on the other side of your screen. See also the Blahaj.Zone Community Rules
No bigotry of any kind allowed. Making racist, sexist, trans-/homo-/queerphobic, otherwise demeaning and hateful comments is not ok. Disabilities and mental illnesses are not to be used as insults and should not be part of your comment unless speaking of your own or absolutely relevant.
No gatekeeping and being rude to people who don't agree with you. Leave “gamer” stereotypes out of your comment (e.g. sexless, neck bearded, teenaged, basement-dwelling, etc). Don't compare people to animals, or otherwise deny their humanity. Even if you think someone is the worst human on the planet, do not wish death or harm upon them.
No "justice porn". Posts regarding legal action and similar is allowed, but celebrating someone being harmed is not.
Contrarianism for its own sake is unnecessary and not welcome.
No planning operations, no brigading, no doxxing or similar activities allowed.
Absolutely no defense of GamerGate and other right-wing harassment campaigns, no TERFs and transphobia, racism, dismissing of war crimes and praise of fascists. This includes “JAQing off”, intentionally asking leading questions while pretending to be a neutral party. This also applies to other forms of authoritarianism and authoritarian or criminal actions by liberal or leftist governments.
NSFW threads, such as ones discussing erotic art, pornography and sex work, must be tagged as such.
Moderators can take action even if none of the rules above are broken.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
How many blockbuster movies has she been the lead in? Because I have a strong feeling being a woman isn't the reason she makes less like she's trying to paint it as.
Last movie she did was Wonka. Whose name is on the poster...? I'm seeing $628 million box office
Movie before that 'Wicked Little Letters" were her name is on the poster. $10 million at box office
I go out of my way to watch things she is in because she is such a good actor. I have heard the same from at least a few other people when discussing stuff she is in. She is consistently the best actor in anything she is in. I suspect that most people view her this way considering all the awards she wins. That kind and of dismantles the argument that she doesn't bring in viewers like her male counterparts do.
It doesn't matter that she is filthy rich, injustice is injustice. If we built a broken system that stratifies wealth, it's still MORE broken if it also advantages some people over others.
Ah I’m not in love with the other comments so far. Those commenters are all complaining class based wealth and wage disparity. That’s 100% a problem. A really big one! But the actress’s statement is about gender discrimination. And that is also a big problem.
We should never use the existence one problem to diminish or ignore others.
When she is out earning the other women in her field, she can speak up on this topic.
Sandra Bullock landed 70 million out of a single gig more than 5 times this ladies' net worth. Last I checked, Sandra Bullock identified as a woman.
Margot Robbie is salaried at this ladies' lifetime earning off of just Barbie.
Actor pay is not anything comparable to working class wages.
Her complaint isn't happening in a vacuum, it's happening in an economy that has single working mothers earning 10 bucks an hour while she's a fucking millionaire.
When she is out earning the other women in her field, she can speak up on this topic
"Only the highest paid women in their occupation can discuss the gender pay gap"
This is literally the fucking stupidest take I can conceive one may have on the topic. I quite honestly can not even imagine a worse one, because any "worse" one at least would more honestly betray the sexism of the holder. You've managed to hit peak bad faith argument before slipping into overtly championing sexism.
It's fucking stupid to compare labor issues to a multimillionaire begging for second yacht money, but I was trying to be kind enough to explain the differences in pay and achievement amongst artists like her in good faith. I guess we can step past that bit to address your mega wealth bootlicking directly since you decided to be a prick about it.
She is paid more than 10,000x 90% of other actresses, yet she is not petitioning for her pay to be averaged out with worse actresses. Why? That is clearly a larger wage gap that needs to be overcome that is far more impactful to more people.
Because acting in the top percent is about how marketable their image is. That is what dictates their income. I named off examples of women who disprove her BS about it only being men who can leverage their image to insane wealth.
If she truly wanted to address a wage gap, the wage gap between lead/peak actors and smaller roles are far greater. That is an actual labor class issue, not just petty bs. It takes a true idiot to think acting is the labor market to build a case for a wage gap in and focus on this part of it rather than the far larger issue.
Making petty complaints like this as a multimillionaire in the face of people facing true labor issues is probably part of why her marketability is hurt.
Fuck off with the pretentious bitching about a multimillionaire second mega-yacht money.
For those of us with the capacity to have two non-competing ideas in our heads at once, it's extremely easy. The mental gymnastics you have to do here in order to maintain exactly one concept in your head at once honestly looks painful to me.
Yes, she has earned more money than most people ever will. That's problem #1.
Yes, there is a wage gap. That's problem #2.
Any person with a shred of mental capacity doesn't have to make a choice between these two ideas.
And like, Sandra Bullock made bank, so there is no gender pay gap? Fucking sweet. There was a black president, so racism is done too, right?
Err, wait, sorry... By your logic, since I'm a member of a race that isn't generally discriminated against, I'm probably not allowed to acknowledge that racism exists for others?
JFC
A multimillionaires struggle for a second yacht is the same thing as racial discrimination lmao.
Shut the fuck up.
See, that's my exact point. You can't keep track of even two things.
By your logic, she is simultaneously:
-
Not well paid enough to speak on the issue, (because Sandra Bullock?)
-
Paid too much to be able to speak on the issue (because she needs a second yacht?)
Somehow, 5 is a smaller number than 10 but a larger number than 1.
Incredible. When you change a part of the comparison to be a different context, something can be more or less than other things.
Great job Einstein 👏
Well, no, because you already said she needs to make more than Sandra Bullock, who makes more than her, but she already makes too much.
It's like asking me to pick a number that is both larger than 10 and smaller than 5. There is no such number.
A millionaire is crying about wage disparity, but not for the people making 7 bucks an hour. I hope this kind of greed starts suffocating people.
Paid a lifetimes worth of money for playing dress up.
Complains about it.
Never change, actors .
Sounds easy. Why don't you go do it?
I don't have generational wealth like many of these actors do. There's also a lot of nepotism and if you are not an industry insider, it's near impossible to even meet people who have connections in the industry.
We don't have generational wealth to fall back on when we don't succeed, thus making it more difficult or impossible for someone in the lowest class to make it as a top billed actor.
Neither did Olivia Colman: Her mother was a nurse, her father a surveyor. Decidedly middle class, but she was not born into wealth, nor the children of famous people. She studied to become a teacher, before she got a few small roles in British TV and build a career out of that. She went the long way.
Saying 'for playing dress up' discredits you, since acting is actually really hard.
" Paid a lifetimes worth of money.
Complains about it.
Never change, people . "
is better