this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
1091 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

11808 readers
360 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Definitely has his grip on reality, this one

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Shit, look at LA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

NYC is so fucking hostile that even if they did implement those things, absolutely no one would use them. Half of it wouldn't fit in the part of Manhattan that has congestion pricing anyway.

What actually causes congestion is a shit ton of cars trying to kill each other to get 5ft ahead of the next guy while competing with box trucks and ebikes for the only lane that isn't blocked by a double parked cop car.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Fix and expand the US public transportation system. Building infrastructure for automobiles is fucking backwards.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Has he seen the roads in so called communist nations? Good luck cycling on those.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly, Cuba and North Korea both have pretty decent (urban) roads. Pyongyang even has some bike lanes, bike parking, and bikesharing infrastructure

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Please bro one more line on the highway bro please just one more lane"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

This is the same logic that says the only answer to gun violence is more guns

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

this Chud is like proven to be wrong by math and science so we could just tell him that facts don't care about his feelings

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'd say he's right. In a way. Cars don't create congestion, they are congestion.

Fine. And with this realisation let's end the phrase "I'm stuck in traffic". Cars aren't stuck in traffic, they are traffic.

Every bike on the road is one less car.

Other than that this guy seriously needs to get out into the fresh air and spend sometime around people (if it is a guy, it's overwhelmingly most likely a bot and so a genuinely harmful thing to engage with, get angry about, republish here, or do anything with other than ignore).

Social media is just getting worse, and although there is much to like about defederation, a lot of the content here is not healthy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

let’s end the phrase “I’m stuck in traffic”.

I'm contributing to traffic? I'm doing my part joining the traffic?

So many tempting options highlighting our individual responsibility to the collective problem... yet none of them actually used. Ever. I wonder why. Surely it's because of "others"!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

I like "I'm traffic." Succinct, to the point.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Bikes are not usually allowed on the highway, yet the highway experiences congestion. How is that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Because of the bike lanes in the other streets of course.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I once had the pleasure of cycling the Shimanami Kaido in Japan, a bike route that connects the islands of Honshu and Shikoku, hopping between all these minor islands on the way over suspension bridges carrying the main highway.

The bike lane is protected the whole time. In one case, the bike route is actually below the deck of the bridge, and you're on a fenced-in catwalk hundreds of feet over the channel between the islands. Views for miles over Osaka bay.

Honestly, when I look back at my life, it's probably my favorite thing I've ever done. If only the U.S. invested in bike infrastructure like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

What... next thing you know you'll ask people to use reason. /s

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Fun fact: The faster a car travels, the bigger the spacing between the cars gets. That's necessary to leave enough distance for emergency stops.

While the speed increases linearly, the spacing increases with the square, meaning at double the speed, the spacing quadruples, which in turn means that throughput (number of cars per hour) halves.

This is the reason why many regions use electronic speed signs to drop the speedlimit lower when there's congestion. Because it increases throughput and thus reduces travel times.

The optimum speed for high throughput is 30km/h.

Counterintuitive as it might be, drivers should be all for 30km/h speed limit in cities, because it would make them get to work faster.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

You can cite an infinite amount of proven facts and studies, car brains will never accept your „communist propaganda“. This whole discussion is too emotionally loaded to be based on facts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The problem is that often streets are not congested, and then 50km/h is much more time efficient.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yep, and at that speed, 50km/h on an "empty" street INSIDE a city, that's also the most "efficient" speed to avoid those pesky children bits getting stuck on your windchill were you to tackle one while checking your phone.

Apologies for the sarcasm but most drivers I encounter on a daily basis absolutely do not have the sustained concentration behind wheels to safely drive a 50km/h within actual cities.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If children are a factor (residential street, school zone, playground, etc) there's all the reason to limit to 30, or even 20 (like the street I live where kids are playing around). Optionally time restricted.

Main avenues with clear sidewalks separated by a green strip can have 50 or even 60 km/h limits.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

As an adult, relatively big (1m85) who doesn't randomly run across a street but rather use solely clearly marked zebras I sadly have to report that I had numerous encounter with cars at a very uncomfortable distance to my body, some even touching me (not an accident proper though). I did have of course the occasional wave saying "Oops, sorry I didn't see you or care for slowing down, moving on!". When I say occasional it's probably once a month or more.

To clarify this happened next to a park with very VERY good visibility, a straight line without trees, where it's slightly higher speed than around. Namely small streets around the park are 20km/h, that avenue is 50km/h. It is actually such a problem a red light has been installed 200m further. I assume that enough cars refused to yield so that this change was made.

This makes me believe that unfortunately, even though MOST drivers are indeed able to safely drive in "Main avenues with clear sidewalks" there is still a non negligible amount from my experience as a pedestrian who absolutely can not and are a danger for everyone, kids and adults alike.

That being said, you have the right to believe that few accidents are acceptable if it allows most people to keep such a certain speed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm an adult just slightly bigger and have never had an encounter like you describe, and I lived in a big city decades, using public transport and walking exclusively. If drivers in your environment are that bad, stricter limits are reasonable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

That's also the fastest speed before sharply increasing the likelihood of fatality in pedestrian collisions

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

What it wrong with that guy? Did a bike fuck his wife or something?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›