this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
1100 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

11808 readers
1080 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Definitely has his grip on reality, this one

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The problem is that often streets are not congested, and then 50km/h is much more time efficient.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And there’s where we invent roundabouts. Even when the streets are not congested the time to cross any urban area is dominated by the stops. It much more beneficial to eliminate stop signs and red lights, to keep you moving consistently than to let you speed a little more to your next stopping point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, big thumbs up for roundabouts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, unless you're a pedestrian.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Why's it a problem? I crossed them every day, cars usually drive quite slowly around them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yep, and at that speed, 50km/h on an "empty" street INSIDE a city, that's also the most "efficient" speed to avoid those pesky children bits getting stuck on your windchill were you to tackle one while checking your phone.

Apologies for the sarcasm but most drivers I encounter on a daily basis absolutely do not have the sustained concentration behind wheels to safely drive a 50km/h within actual cities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I have seen old people driving around with oxygen tubes in their noses more times than I feel is safe.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If children are a factor (residential street, school zone, playground, etc) there's all the reason to limit to 30, or even 20 (like the street I live where kids are playing around). Optionally time restricted.

Main avenues with clear sidewalks separated by a green strip can have 50 or even 60 km/h limits.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

As an adult, relatively big (1m85) who doesn't randomly run across a street but rather use solely clearly marked zebras I sadly have to report that I had numerous encounter with cars at a very uncomfortable distance to my body, some even touching me (not an accident proper though). I did have of course the occasional wave saying "Oops, sorry I didn't see you or care for slowing down, moving on!". When I say occasional it's probably once a month or more.

To clarify this happened next to a park with very VERY good visibility, a straight line without trees, where it's slightly higher speed than around. Namely small streets around the park are 20km/h, that avenue is 50km/h. It is actually such a problem a red light has been installed 200m further. I assume that enough cars refused to yield so that this change was made.

This makes me believe that unfortunately, even though MOST drivers are indeed able to safely drive in "Main avenues with clear sidewalks" there is still a non negligible amount from my experience as a pedestrian who absolutely can not and are a danger for everyone, kids and adults alike.

That being said, you have the right to believe that few accidents are acceptable if it allows most people to keep such a certain speed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I sadly have to report that I had numerous encounter with cars at a very uncomfortable distance to my body

When I was younger and had worse impulse control, some fool in a sports car blasted through the zebra crossing I was in, missing me by less than a foot, only to stop a few feet from me because there was a stationary queue of traffic ahead of him (so why go through the zebra crossing at all?). So I kicked out one of his tail lights, kicked off his driver's side wing mirror, and when he tried to get out of the car, repeatedly kicked the door shut on his ankle each time he'd try to open it. At some point, he realised I was not only much larger than him but also much crazier, and drove on (the queue had cleared by then). Ah, the days before there were ubiquitous cameras!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

To clarify this happened next to a park with very VERY good visibility, a straight line without trees, where it's slightly higher speed than around.

That's not surprising to me (as an engineer); the dangerous encounters probably happened because the street was straight and had a generous clear zone.

Strong Towns "30 days of confessions" series has a couple of good (short! -- under 2 minutes each) videos explaining it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHXiZ3wEzMY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGwe1Hf2Igg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Also makes me think of Jevons's paradox (or the rebound effect) but for attention or even more broadly cognition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Fascinating, thanks for sharing!

Of course it makes sense. In fact I believe I have a similar problem while cycling on a one way street for cars while cycling on the (non protected) bike lane of the opposite direction. I hate that street because very often cars do not move away... because they don't look up. They are busy doing I don't know what in their cars... probably because, if I understood the idea properly, they think it's all fine, nobody "should" come from anywhere but behind them, so the "can" be "distracted".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm an adult just slightly bigger and have never had an encounter like you describe, and I lived in a big city decades, using public transport and walking exclusively. If drivers in your environment are that bad, stricter limits are reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yet I also see them and a lot more frequently since pandemic. I still claim everyone forgot how to drive safely.

For me the big problem is that it’s legal to “turn right on red”. However people for get that you’re supposed to come to a full stop and to yield to any road user. So many times I’m in the crosswalk with the walk signal lighted yet someone zooms through to take a right on red barely slowing and without concern for pedestrians

We also seem to have gotten a lot worse with “stretching a yellow”. Why is it that I can wait for a light to turn red, then wait a couple more seconds for the walk signal to come on, yet still be endangered by someone blasting through the intersection claiming “my light was yellow, bro”.

Or maybe it’s just the self-centeredness. People have so much trouble being aware that someone is travelling differently than they are. Pedestrians are invisible because “everyone drives”, cars zoom right up to and through crosswalks at a red light because “no one will be in the crosswalk”.

It’s become a running joke with my kids that you always have to look the wrong way before crossing the street. We regularly cross a one way street where we have twice had close calls with someone going the wrong way. Knowing the layout, I’m pretty sure it’s intentional. It would be difficult to do on accident and I can see the “short cut” being much more convenient

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

My guess North American (because of the turn right on red) and European car cultures are different. European cities are much more walkable and drivers are used to pedestrians. I rarely have a car not stop if I come up to a cross walk, and basically 100% if I'm with my kids.