this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
445 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

72041 readers
2791 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, China generated 834 terawatt-hours of solar power.

Which is more than the G7 countries generated, and more than the US and EU combined. In fact the only country group that generates more solar power than China is the OECD, all 38 countries of it.

Data: @ember-energy.org

Source: https://bsky.app/profile/nathanielbullard.com/post/3lsbbsg6ohk2j

(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Amazing how fast you can build stuff when there's safety standards, no environmental regulations, no labour rights and the government can expropriate property without a time consuming legal process!

Though I think a prefer living in a country where I have rights even if it takes a bit longer to build stuff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We tried getting rid of environmental regulations, safety standards, labour rights, etc. in America and I'm still waiting for when stuff gets built faster... At least the government can't expropriate property! oh wait... Well at least we still have our rights? oh wait...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (18 children)

They also expanded coal power, roads, and removed their population limiting policies, though. They produce about 3 times as much CO2 per person as India, Indonesia, and many South American nations, likely many nations in Africa as well but theres a lot of missing data.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Good for China on that!

To add some perspective, China is about 2 and a quarter times as large as the EU nations, and according to currentresults.com seems to get a bit more sunshine than the EU does. So the difference isn't quite as stark as this post makes it seem.

But still, it's good that China is taking solar power seriously. I didn't realize they were doing that well.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

It is strategic necessity for China for energy security and for their own environment. Their predominant source of electricity has been coal which they have abundant of but is polluting the air they breathe. Does anyone recall the issues they had at Beijing Olympics? They have insufficient sources of oil and gas domestically. Alternative energy sources are their best domestic source of energy.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

People talk about China's energy use like it's not* their* energy use. They used that power to produce the stupid shit that you bought, dumbass. You're responsible for that energy use, despite it being generated in China.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

So you're saying we should stop trading with China?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is legit true IDK why you're getting downvoted. Just because it doesn't show on US energy usage, every time you buy stupid shit you don't need like an automatic corn dog maker or a taco holder shaped like a sombrero that holds a shot glass in the middle, that has a real cost in terms of CO2 and that is done in China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i think I need an automatic corn dog maker and a taco holder shaped like a sombrero that holds a shot glass in the middle

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I immediately went looking on temu :)

I don't the poster meant to happen!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Nice I love seeing China Greenwashing get reposted. Remember that China is 3x the size of the EU so them having 3x the solar power is a stupid comparison. China also continues to increase coal generation by more than renewables. China is only %27 renewables while the EU is 47%. China is 17% of the world and almost 40% of the emissions.

OECD countries are actually working on emission reduction instead of china which continue to increase emissions with absolute no signs of stopping. They have missed every single renewable target and goal they're set. But dont worry im sure they will stop building more coal plants in 2030, im sure it wont be to late by then.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

China also continues to increase coal generation by more than renewables.

I don't believe this:

https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/china/

In 2024, China approved 66.7GW of new coal-fired capacity, started construction on 94.5GW of coal power projects

Even if you add these 2 together and pretend they were finished the same year it's not even close to:

China’s renewable energy sector made remarkable progress in 2024, adding 356 gigawatts (GW) of wind and solar capacity

https://theasialive.com/chinas-energy-production-coal-and-renewables-locked-in-competition-amid-clean-energy-boom/2025/02/14/

They have missed every single renewable target and goal they’re set.

I don't believe this is true either unless you are referring to some other targets?

In 2020, China set a goal to install at least 1,200 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind power by 2030. By the end of 2024, China had already surpassed this target, reaching this milestone 6 years ahead of schedule. This was made possible by aggressive investments, government policies, and a surge in solar and wind installations.

China’s solar capacity grew by an incredible 45.2% in 2024, adding 277 GW. Wind capacity also saw a strong increase of 18%, with an additional 80 GW installed. Overall, total power generation capacity rose by 14.6% in 2024, driven mainly by renewables.

https://carboncredits.com/chinas-renewable-energy-boom-a-record-breaking-shift-or-still-chained-to-coal/

China is only %27 renewables while the EU is 47%.

Don't worry, just like everything else I'm sure that will flip in the future

Europe has plenty of money apparently to suddenly:

NATO leaders on Wednesday confirmed their commitment to more than double defence spending by 2035 banding words like "crucial", "momentous" and "quantum leap"

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/06/25/defence-spend-to-5-of-gdp-ukraine-russia-the-key-takeaways-from-the-nato-summit

Just why does it take an emergency to make some proper progress:

Global energy storage owner-operator BW ESS and Spanish energy storage developer Ibersun say a new joint venture is intended to build eight four-hour battery projects across the country, with a combined capacity of 2.2 GW, 8.8 GWh.

https://reneweconomy.com.au/no-time-to-waste-huge-big-battery-plans-unveiled-for-spain-as-accusations-traded-over-blackout/

Where will the batteries be made I wonder?

On top of this energy prices in the EU are ridiculous and for some reason they still can't get off the gas, which leads to an unreal point of France giving more money to Russia for gas than in aid to Ukraine, so they have high energy prices and they're funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine and their companies and manufacturing are leaving them... to go to China...

https://aussie.zone/comment/17361559

But I appreciate your scepticism (I gave your post an upvote because China does sometimes get a little bit too much credit), they are the worlds top producer of CO2 by FAR but I do want to address

Greenwashing

This is something I've wanted for a while:

It requires EU importers to pay a levy corresponding to the embedded carbon emissions in 303 emission-intensive products

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/what-to-expect-from-the-eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_719d2ff9-en.html

I've long disliked that places like the EU and the rest of the west can export their dirty manufacturing over to China where companies take advantage of lax or no environmental regulations, it's a false economy and makes the west look a whole lot greener and cleaner than it would if we were manufacturing what we used back at home

China has Apple by the balls’: How the rising superpower captured the tech giant

https://www.smh.com.au/national/china-has-apple-by-the-balls-how-the-rising-superpower-captured-the-tech-giant-20250609-p5m5z1.html

edit: boy I sure do love to procrastinate and talk about energy and co2 instead of studying :|

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

China approved 66.7GW of new coal-fired capacity, started construction on 94.5GW of coal power projects

New power plants don't mean using those power plants. Resilience/backup power. Use of coal for electricity has declined despite new coal plants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

tbh I'm surprised that you even got upvotes, didn't went that well for me with a similar answer on another post...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago

Yeah the .ml must have missed this thread.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

While everyone else is paying the costs that come with environmental regulation china is exploiting it and getting celebrated for it. Its insane what a few dollars can do to change peoples minds on a topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah I tracked it back to that, but couldn't find the graph shown and had no knowledge of the ember.

Having said that, I'm all for the green revolution and would love to see it go harder. As a petrol head the idea of guilt free fuel is like a holy grail

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm curious how much of it they consumed though. I read recently the UK keeps on paying Wind farms (for example) to NOT supply the grid as they don't need it at certain times, and it wasn't going into batteries for later either. Just generated and...gone?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

They pay the windfarms when too much power is generated for the grid to handle. The wind turbines are then throttled accordingly and the windfarm owners are reimbursed for the lost potential. At least that's how it goes in Germany. It's kind of an incentive to upgrade the power grid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can be sold as well. I looked at this chart to get numbers, not sure about accuracy. Shows China made around 9.27 PWh and used 8.93 PWh. The G7 used about 7 PWh total.

https://countryeconomy.com/energy-and-environment/electricity-consumption

Edit: realized my typo and now I'm questioning. in Watt hours, does it use Petawatt hours like computers do... I assume? Changed TWh to PWh

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Cool if true, but the source seemed to be bluesky soooo it's a big gain of salt

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Solar panels don't work as well with greysky.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's great that they are creating that much. They have the largest incentive too, the U.S. second. The G7 they refer to (U.S. U.K. Japan Germany France Italy Canada) used a total of ~7 PWh of electricity in 2023. China used ~9 PWh.

Hopefully the G7 starts catching up. Chinas form of government puts their long term expendetures into play when figuring out where to invest as they have a monetary stake in how much it costs to produce the electricity.

In countries like the U.S. we see companies who have large investments in oil, coal, and such trying to manipulate the transition because they didn't have the investments already in place with alternative energy sources. The U.S. government has no money "invested" per say, so long term they don't care that it costs more during the transition as those profits are made by the companies. The old oil tycoons will milk every penny under the attitude "I got mine.". Then they'll die, and we will hope some companies have transitions in place that bring low cost efficient renewable systems long term

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

🤔 it was made into fancy graphs by the guy on Bluesky but the data was from ember-energy.org who are well known for supplying renewable stats

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah I think by "source" they just mean they're just giving credit to the bsky post they got the graph from, the data seems to be from a green energy transition thinktank. No idea if you'd put more stock in ember-energy.org/, so make of that what you will 🤷‍♂️

From the website:

Data into action

Open data and intelligent policy analysis to unlock a clean, electrified energy future

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's where I ended up and didn't know what to do with them. I guess I trust them as much as any unknown internet source

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Good on them. The earlier they can shut down those coal plants, the better.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They‘ll keep building more coal power plants in the global south and export coal. There‘s a lot of money to be made.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

They're also actually still building more coal power in mainland China.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›