I’m not trying to be an asshole and I’m not even referencing this situation specifically. But why is there a requirement for sign language interpreter when closed captioning exists? Again, I’m just genuinely curious, not trying to offend anyone.
this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
86 points (98.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2933 readers
465 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
At a guess, closed captions can't really be done live nearly as well. Also, can't have those if you're there IRL
Good, sue them for ev-er-y thing!
They can't have a sign language interpreter because that would be DEI.
They can just hit a white dude in a MAGA hat to flip the bird at the room. It’ll be a fairly accurate translation of whatever they’re saying.