this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
421 points (99.3% liked)

Buy European

6060 readers
153 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago

Data retention != mass surveilance. Data retention != built-in backdoors. Even the link summary spells out exactly what the purpose of the proposal is (criminal proceedings) and the intended objective (data retention standards).

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I tried posting on reddit, but it's blocked for some reason.

[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

" built-in backdoors,"

Good luck getting that into a lot of the open source tech we now use.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only the headline asserts "built-in backdoors", the actual link... not so much.

A reasonable reading of the proposal, assuming it came into effect, is that ISPs, banks, telcos etc would be asked to retain certain records for a number of months or years in a harmonised way. Law enforcement agencies would be required to ask for it in the exact same way they ask for records right now and all the rules concerning GDPR etc would still apply.

Open source tech has zero to do with it, it's a matter of policy.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The only wrinkle there is "voluntary compliance," which might be construed as warrantless access.

[โ€“] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Simple: the open source tech is now illegal unless they can afford a full time legal team.

It's regulatory capture: the big firms get consulted by the EU and can design the laws to the detriment of competition. It's why now, for example, european cars are so expensive and restricted to a handfull of producers.

Alphabet and friends welcome regulation like this.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ