this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
846 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

6324 readers
1432 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The plot demanded a reason for him to stay behind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Im pretty sure its because they were trying to keep him on campus to keep him safe and used that as a bs excuse and he didn't realize it until later cause he's a kid. Idgaf about Harry Potter, haven't picked up a book in 20 years, but I remember this.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, as there was a killer on the loose, suspected to be super crazy and in the area. In which case, would it be safe for the other kids?

It's not logical whichever way you look at it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's because they thought Black was going for retribution on Harry so they probably figured that he was largely laser focused on him. Though he did blow up a bunch of folks in their eyes so that logic doesnt really hold water.

TLDR: Rowling dumb and doesn't even think things through within the same book.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but they also thought he was a crazy psychopath, on top of blowing people up. So, still not the kid friendly environment that would be suitable, if logic is used.

But they are kids books, so it's not a big deal. However, she's not a genius author. She struck it lucky. Like many, she thinks it's merit based, now that she's a billionaire. And she uses that big brain to trample on the rights of others. If she wasn't a billionaire, she'd be the crazy psychopath she wrote about (who in this case turned out to be a good guy in the books; she wouldn't ).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

His legal guardians do not consent to him even attending the school in the first place, to the extent where he needs to be broken out to attend every year. But no field trip.

[–] [email protected] 225 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

In all seriousness, this is what happens when you write novels without doing any world-building and just put down whatever seems "fun". The are sooooo many things in that series that make no sense once they are superceded by later plot devices. Rowling didn't think any of it through ahead of time and gave almost no thought to internal consistency with previous content when she wrote new things.

It's honestly a terrible series in most regards and it's kind of disappointing how popular it became.

Also she a trans-hating bigot. Fuck J.K. Rowling. Can't forget that part whenever discussing her or her work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Way back, years ago, and if memory serves...

There was short story about Harry Potter in a Disney Adventures magazine one month and I think that was supposed to be all there was as far as the story. The popularity of it may have had JKR rushing to build a more in depth story and throwing anything in it that seemed whimsical and fun to a kid, regardless if it made sense.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All true, though i still found it fun to read when the books came out. At that age my critical thinking skills were not as developed yet, and since that age group is the intended target audience the popularity is not that surprising.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I mean, I totally get it. There is just better stuff out there and it sucks that she got lucky when otherr, better authors don't

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Rule of cool supersedes making sense. Yeah there’s a ton of nonsense, but you called it yourself, it’s fun. That’s all that matters.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 week ago (22 children)

The issue I have with this line of reasoning is that there are equally whimsical, better written series that just didn't have good fortune to pop off the way HP did.

It's marketing. And cover art. And simple timing of fads. It sucks. And it funded a horrible person through pure happenstance

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (15 children)

More than fun. It's whimsical.

She's a terrible person. I read the books to my kids but they are puarated so she doesn't get a penny. Same for the movies.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

looks like the magic world's lawyers were just as bad as their muggle counterparts, tbh.

way worse, in fact, when one reads about all the wizengamot proceedings.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He liked a pro trans meme once.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You'd think a woman who can literally transform into an animal would be pro-trans

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago

She would have been if she wasn't written by a massive piece of shit.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›