this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
72 points (97.4% liked)

traingang

22815 readers
66 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

built houses for its settler volk to grow their population in tbh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

It's nice in spirit but suburbs still suck, especially when you arrive at the single family home with the murphy bed and the fold away kitchenette. What's the fucking point, just do an apartment building for gods sake

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

yeonmi-park In North Korea, the government hides its homeless population from tourists by forcing them to live in houses

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stalin contrary to popular belief also disliked "ugly commieblocks" and preferred classical style architecture. The switch up happened post-Stalin due the increased need for quick housing.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Man here’s a hot take then I guess, I genuinely don’t think commieblocks are ugly at all, and most of the postwar Soviet developments look waaaaaay nicer to live in than areas of “classical architecture”

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Everybody hates commieblocks because whereever they are, they've been in disrepair for 50 years. The west built them, in europe at least, quite extensively in the 70s and by the time the first actual maintenance was up it was the 80s so that wasn't done anymore. I don't have to tell people here how it happened in what is now Russia.

I think it's an underlooked fact that these fuckers are habitable, still. I have been to east german towns and villages full of single family homes (in modernity, in which used to be like, farms buildings or local production of something) and it looks like the apocalypse has happened.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I think the current era of featureless glass towers and shitty oil-derived five-over-one condo blocks are a blight on the eyes. While I prefer neoclassical and Gothic and romantic and other ostentatious ornate architectural styles for the depth of detail and the opportunities for symbolic art and pleasing visuals, Soviet brutalist buildings are also quite beautiful when integrated with the environment. Like yeah, they're ugly when shot on a cloudy day in winter but they're spectacular when surrounded by greenery and maintained.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I genuinely don’t think commieblocks are ugly at all

i really like China's ones, they're fine when well maintained and well painted.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've lived in worse. Just plant some fucking trees around and have a color on them other than gray tbh.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I used quotations because I dont agree with the take and WASNT doing a hot take. I just relayed that during the Stalinist period more ostentatious common housing was build.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah sorry wasn’t trying to make an assertion about your opinion just disagree with Stalin (and basically all westerners). Glad we’re in agreement

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Article failed to cover whether there was any diversity among the recipients of the homes. Given the time frame this happened in, I suspect this mostly if not entirely benefited white people. A big part of our country not having programs like this is rooted in fear that non whites might benefit. Good ole racism… convincing poor whites to vote against their own interests.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

yeah the Federal Housing Administration actively discriminated against black people and other minorities. the new deal brought white flight suburbs and redlining.

https://retroreport.org/video/whites-only-suburbs-how-the-new-deal-shut-out-black-homebuyers/

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

ah yes, the famous "New Deal" where white people got some things and non-whites did not.

in this way, The New Deal was remarkably similar to The Old Deal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean the secretary of labour seemed to be more sympathetic to Black Americans. It doesnt seem that it was specifically excluding non-white workers.

"Among his special assistants was George Edmund Haynes, 1918 to 1921, who was the first African American to earn a doctorate from Columbia University."

"The administration was working to encourage African-American support for the war effort, both among men who served and those who were working in war industries."

"In December 1916, Wilson addressed a conference on social insurance in which he discussed State developments in that field, such as the provision of mothers' pensions and workmen's compensation, and also spoke of the possibility of the United States introducing old-age pensions and universal health insurance.The Department of Labor had earlier in Wilson's term expressed favor towards an invitation to attend an International Conference on Social Insurance."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for highlighting that part… clearly I skimmed more than I read.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Its not in the article.