I'm not a doomsday prepper, but stuff like this makes me want to sequester some gear...
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
362 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
70201 readers
3835 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you cab use it unless you have it.
get what you need, take what you want.
load more comments
(7 replies)
lol we couldn't even prepare for fascist takeover of the country. why tf would anyone think we'd be prepared for a solar firestorm
Invest in metal stoves and big tents today!
Im starting to think the fermi paradox is based around what philosophy it follows. "Efficiency" like lean or robustness like six sigma.
If a transmissions company tried to spend money preparing for a disaster like this, their shareholders would sue them into the ground and lobby to make it illegal to acknowledge the existence of the sun.
I mean, having a tested and proven DR/BCM plan is kind of an important part of being a serious business....
I'm glad this threat is at least starting to be taken seriously. As an amateur radio operator, I got incredibly interested in how the weather on the sun affects radio propagation and power management here on Earth.
Better a CME than an EMP just simply because there is at least some time to prepare for a massive CME. Whereas an EMP has absolutely no warning whatsoever.
In the event of a massive CME off-grid homes and buildings are likely to fare much better because they are not connected to the power grid. The problem comes with long transmission lines where incredibly large charge differentials can build up over distance. shorter wires can't build up nearly the same amount of charge differential.
Edit: I feel it's important to mention that grid tie systems are going to be just as vulnerable as on grid because you still have the grid actually physically connected to the building.
It's worth noting that even though a building might have solar, the systems usually disable themselves in the event of a blackout to prevent back feeding into the grid.
That wouldn't be an off grid building then.
That's known as a grid tie system and my edit mentions that. The only way it's going to help is if the grid is physically disconnected from the building as in the wire is not connected to the building at any point.
Unless I'm missing something here, thats what an LVD should do, and anyone grid-connected with solar should have.
During a normal power outage, you're right. That does keep you isolated on your own island. But in a case like this, the voltage is likely to spike to incredibly high levels on wires that aren't meant to carry it and cause arcing and possibly fires. That's why you want to be physically disconnected.
Got it, at that point (extremely high voltage) you'd need suppression at the panel. Which I would hope people have inline, but not expect like an LVD.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Note: "Would Be a Catastrophe" even back when the agencies involved in mitigating the disaster still existed.
Oy. I really don't want to see what happens when we're faced with an actual challenge. This is... yikes.
I would get a case of beer and go to the library and read until the internet was back on. You can't stop my escapism that easily.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)