The only people impressed by AI code are people who have the level to be impressed by AI code. Same for AI playing chess.
this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1859 readers
25 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I thought chess was a solved game at this point. Was I mistaken?
You may be thinking of checkers. Chess is still open and unsolved, although there is strong evidence that the player who goes first has a large advantage.
I'm very confused by this comparison, AI is much, much better at chess than people.
Imagine being in a self-own competition and you’re up against ben shapiro and this guy
ultimate self-own sentence
"grok, is the female orgasm real"
I got an AI PR in one of my projects once. It re-implemented a feature that already existed. It had a bug that did not exist in the already-existing feature. It placed the setting for activating that new feature right after the setting for activating the already-existing feature.
view more: next ›