this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

713 readers
66 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body. More info

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In March, a federal judge in Washington state ordered a nationwide halt on the administration's ban, saying the government failed to show it would enhance "unit cohesion, good order or discipline".

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals did not block the lower court's ruling, keeping the injunction in place.

With the Supreme Court order, that pause will lift while the servicemembers' lawsuit makes its way through lower courts.

"Today's Supreme Court ruling is a devastating blow to transgender servicemembers who have demonstrated their capabilities and commitment to our nation's defense," Lambda Legal and the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, which are representing the plaintiffs, said in a joint statement.

"By allowing this discriminatory ban to take effect while our challenge continues, the Court has temporarily sanctioned a policy that has nothing to do with military readiness and everything to do with prejudice," it said.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"We're not sure if this is allowed, so we'll let him ruin lives and military careers while it gets hashed out."

Dumb as fuck.