this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
759 points (95.9% liked)

World News

46443 readers
2603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good job working class Japan 👏 full support burn the tyranny of the rich down. Starting a Global workering class revolt 👊

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You miss spelled it... Its not quiet quitting... Its doing what's necessary and nothing excess.. if you aren't paid for it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Workers are doing their jobs! Gasp!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Considering that work ethic literally kills people: Good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"kills" ... This is still occurring, let's use the present tense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know if this was the intention, but that came off a bit condescending in my opinion. I completely agree with you, present tense would have been more apt (I'm going to edit it to fix it), but I resent the way your correction was presented. If that was not your intention, I apologize. I'm tired this morning.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man, fuck all those guys for doing their job to a sufficient quality and quantity to not get fired, eh?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago

Well productivity is a good thing, I think the problem is the incentives. Their government essentially funnels all the money to their elderly via monetary policy, and the youth get the table scraps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"Quiet quitting" is not a trend. Like, at all. If you have a coworker that doesn't want to do their job, your employer has a shitty employee. That's it, an isolated incident. The term itself is basically the same as boomers screeching about how "nobody wants to work anymore"...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you have a coworker that doesn’t want to do their job, your employer has a shitty employee.

I think it's less that people don't want to do any work at all or less than the "minimum" (except for some rare cases), and more that people are doing only the minimum, not putting in any extra effort, not going above and beyond - because their salaries are stagnating, their employers are only paying them the minimum and not a cent more, and their extra efforts are going unrecognized. Ask me how I know. I have seen it myself personally, multiple times at multiple companies, and I have seen it through my friends experiences as well.

In unions, it's called work-to-rule. Most jobs/companies don't have unions, so we get "quiet quitting" instead. The more conditions stay the same, or the worse they become, the worse the "quiet quitting" becomes.

If you want to motivate your employees, reward them. Give them something to strive towards. Reward their extra efforts! Don't just give them the bare minimum and hope that they will keep going above and beyond for you, because that's not realistic and it's not sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I think it’s a bit of a misnomer. It’s not that people are abandoning their jobs, it’s that they are abandoning the toxic mindset that says line must go up, that good people are good worker drones for their superiors, etc. It’s more like quitting your career but keeping your job even if in a half-assed way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nobody wants to work anymore

I just fire back with "nobody wants to pay us anymore" now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Someone recently used that dumb phrase when telling me about not being able to get timely service at a restaurant. I said to them, "Well maybe they would want to if they were paid honest wages for honest work?" and we haven't talked since. I don't think we're going to be friends anymore.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

FYI the "Japanese crazy long hours and hard work ethic" BS only applies to corporate jobs.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-work-week-by-country

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I fucking hate the 'quiet quitting' term. It puts the onus on the people who are tired of the inhumane hours and treatment, and the accompanying meager pay. Instead of putting it on the companies and government whose policies and ethics are fostering these awful conditions which engender these sorts of worker responses. It's not quiet quitting. It's holding boundaries between work and personal life. It's not allowing the company to steal your time away from you. It's preventing the company from overstepping their position in your life. It's so many things that are important and 'quiet quitting' does those people a disservice in favor of a catchy corporate approved soundbite. I find that disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I did not find any proper meaning of phrase quiet quitting

It might as well mean - working only the amount you are paid for - which sounds totally reasonable.

Totally corporate worded article.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

We used to just call it Work to Rule.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a phrase meant to replace the old phrase "working your wage", because that way of viewing it makes the whole situation less dramatic and more noble … and generates less clicks. Classic newsspeak.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I always took it to mean "doing the least amount of work possible without getting fired." If someone's making an effort to work the amount they're paid for, I wouldn't consider it quiet quitting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

You can define it that way, but the problem is that the authors of the article didn't give a definition. For example, I think they think the term means to do what's in your job description and contract. And they think that workers should be going above and beyond that. But if they were forced to spell it out, then people would ask why companies don't change the job description or contract, because obviously it's ridiculous to ask people to do what you didn't ask them to do.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

we should normalize to punch everyone in the gut who uses the words "quiet quitting".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was probably higher before, but it wasn't as acceptable to say it as it is today.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

You're basically right. Back when unions were a thing, they dubbed this behavior "working your wage" I.e. not volunteering for unpaid labor. "Quiet quitting" is a neologism designed by a think tank to shift the burden of responsibility to the employee

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah because they started to get fucked over

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›