this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Minnesota

835 readers
1 users here now

About Us

We are community-driven and dedicated to celebrating the diverse and inclusive spirit of Minnesota. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or simply fascinated by the Land of 10,000 Lakes, you'll find a warm and welcoming community here. Our goal is to foster meaningful discussions, share local news and events, and create a safe space for everyone to connect and engage.

Rules and Guidelines

Be Kind and Respectful: Treat others with empathy, respect, and understanding. We embrace diversity and encourage civil discourse. Personal attacks, hate speech, discrimination, and harassment will not be tolerated.

Stay on Topic: Keep your posts and comments relevant to Minnesota. Let's focus on discussing local issues, events, news, and culture.

No Spam or Self-Promotion: We love to support local businesses and initiatives, but please refrain from excessive self-promotion or spamming. Posts must provide value to the community.

Avoid Sensationalism: When sharing news articles or stories, please provide accurate and reliable sources. Avoid clickbait titles or exaggerated claims.

No Illegal Activities: Do not promote or encourage illegal activities or engage in any discussions that violate the law.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The law was confusing enough — and troubling enough — that some bars and restaurants decided it was safer to keep hemp-derived beverages off the menu.

At issue was a provision in the state’s recreational marijuana law signed last May that would have prohibited bar servers from selling a patron alcohol and THC beverages in the same five-hour period.

The first confusion was over when bars would start enforcing the “five-hour rule.” Some thought immediately after the bill’s passage, but the myriad effectiveness dates contained in the 300-page bill said it wasn’t to become law until spring 2025. Regardless, the larger issue was this: While a server might know that a patron who they’d served a beer to couldn’t then be served a THC-seltzer, they would have no way of knowing if other patrons had one or the other at another bar.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who is sitting in a bar for five hours?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Changing from a 5 hour rule to avoid giving it to inebriated person is so much cleaner and easier to do. How do track 5 hours really?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

they would have no way of knowing if other patrons had one or the other at another bar

It would probably blow their minds if they found out that people already drink and do drugs at home before they go to any bar. I get that this is probably more about assigning liability than anything else, but it must be embarrassing for legislators to have to pretend that this matters for public safety or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

It was the first thing I thought of having done my responsible service of alcohol certification to work in bars in Australia. Not that it prevents irresponsible service, but you are meant to be checking for specific signs of inebriation in order to selectively deny service to drunk people and adding stoned people into that mix will muddy the waters

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Some people, I’ve heard, smoke weed outside of bars before or after drinking and there are even rumors that sometimes people use cocaine right in bar bathrooms. I’m sure legislators have never heard of anything like that, but I swear it’s true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Nah. Legislators go to strip clubs to do their cocaine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Around here tons of people use weed vapes openly right in the bar (depending on bar’s general vape policy).