this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
923 points (97.2% liked)

Political Memes

7966 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
923
Limited Freedom (lemmy.world)
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 minutes ago

Hey big shoutout to all the Redditors and Lemmy guys who told me that we can have no restrictions on free speech because if we restrict Nazis they will restrict us if they ever gain power.

Welp, here ya go...like I told you...and many of you blocked and/or banned me for saying it. Ironic.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you make the 1st Amendment illegal, the rest of the Constitution cannot be far behind.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

if? people have already been blackbagged for their speech. this is just encoding something already in effect.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How tf can u ban a boycott, how is that even possible let alone provable 🤦 Politics aside if I js don't like a brand that endorses or has ties to Israel would I then be subject to charges. How u trynna force people to buy from certain companies, what if I was bruk, would I be breaking the law? 🤡

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This will probably be used to target protestors and organizers of political movements.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the boycott itself can't reasonably be prosecuted. But it can be used to suppress discussion (e.g. organization, coordination) of said boycott.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is that legal? It doesn't sound legal. I'm sure they could make it illegal for US government agencies to boycott Israel because that's at least partially a foreign policy decision, but private businesses? What are they gonna do, force you to buy Israeli goods?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

narrator: it didn't sound legal because it wasn't.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago

Incremental steps into the police state.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 hours ago

Wait you first blame us for not having free speach, because lying about the holocaust is illegal and now you ban boycotting Israel for engaging in a de facto genocide?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well, we now know what death cult is behind the misery of literally the entire world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 minutes ago

Irony: Nazis are teaching the rest of us who hate Nazis how to hate the Jews

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

And the USSC has definitely ruled that money is equivalent to speech. So boycott activity is logically covered under this Amendment.

If this law passes, a lot of people are going to have a rough year or two until they can get a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because republicans care so much about laws they don't agree with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Or parts of the religions they thump on about.

load more comments
view more: next ›