where does this put the united states on the press freedom index
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)
News
23296 readers
3272 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
isn't it odd that tiktok (which is used by the youngs) is this MAJOR SECURITY ISSUE but facebook (which was credibly implicated being used by the russians to interfere in the election but not used by the youngs) and twitter (which is actively promoting disinfo and white supremacy including from the site's owner and also not really used by the youngs) are skating off scott free.
seems to me that the issue is that established media and political influencers don't know how or can't get any kinds of traction on tiktok that they could via twitter or fb so they're trying to get rid of it. with the existence of facebook and twitter and their known privacy issues, getting all out of sorts about tiktok because they're controlled by the chinese when in reality any government could get their hands on that kind of data is very much misplaced outrage bordering on hysterical. especially since the chinese could get your data by means other than tiktok.
rule 1 is don't put your private self out on public social media.
FUD wins.
It's better to be screwed over by [YOUR COUNTRY'S] ruling class than [OTHER COUNTRY'S].
Buncha tools, the lot of you.
I might be more in favor of this ban if it wasn’t in the hands of a bunch of stodgy, bickering, out-of-touch morons who don’t understand technology.
Everyone keeps saying “Tik Toc ban,” but this is more of a ByteDance ban. If they want to sell off or spin off the business for markets outside of China, they could 100% do that.
The product itself is not the problem.
This is actually an expansion of the PATRIOT act, and it gives immense powers to the president over web based platforms.
People really are not reading the law or articles about it at all.
This has nothing to do with TikTok. TikTok is already incredibly controlled by the US and particularly by the CIA: https://www.mintpressnews.com/tiktok-chinese-trojan-horse-run-former-cia/286780/
China literally does the same shit. You can open up production for sales in China but it has to be majority domestically owned.
Not saying that I agree with it but it is kind of funny to see tankies whine about this.
It's also funny to see "free" market worshipping liberals explain how emulating the CCP's policies is essential to protecting our liberty
It's less funny to see the ACLU EFF and Amnesty International get ignored
Free market worshiping liberals.... lol wut?
Most liberals I know are not big fans of the free market...
the product itself is not the problem
well hold on there partner, lets not get crazy with our sweeping claims here.
What could possibly be wrong about an incredibly engaging experience, that makes me lose track of time, and constantly keeps trying to sneak Joe Rogan content into my day?
This.
Everyone on hexbear is too busy echo-chambering “L liberals” to actually see this for what it is.
I’m so grateful for my frontal lobe development, without it I would’ve indulged in those conversations and lost additional brain matter trying to argue
I don't like TikTok. As much as I don't trust social media ran by US companies. I dont like the idea of one ran by a foreign adversary even more.
That said, I'd hate to see the US equivalent of the Chinese firewall come into being because of legislation like this.
I think delisting it from ios and android appstores would probably be half-sufficient to kill it. Most people won't go out of their way to sideload an app or use a website. Making it so American advertising companies cannot exchange money with tiktok would probably be the other half. No money, extra effort = dead platform.
Edit: just read the draft bill, it probably deosn't even go far enough. It does the first half, but not the second half. It looks like under the bill, advertisers as businesses would still be able to interact with the platform, but the platform would only be accessible via a browser, and no US hosting/vps provider could host any of their services. Any violations would be a civil penalty of up to $500/user (presumably with the penalty of completely being cut off from us businesses if they didn't pay up).
Honestly seems more reasonable than I'd have initially given it credit. It mostly solves the "a foreign adversary could update the app to use my phone as a wiretap" or "a foreign adversary could use their legitimate business dealings to spy from within a datacenter" without actually creating a great firewall.