I would assume there would be arguments around transporting them increasing the chances of it breaking. It would really only make sense to move these back to their country of origin and have them remain there to minimize potential points of failure. The rarer the artifact itself (another rusted out sword or plain clay cup versus a one of a kind manuscript whose pages have become incredibly delicate) the less their respective owners are going to want it to be moved.

Instead, we should be allowing more people the ability to travel and take time to go explore other cultures in their country of origin instead of trying to transport priceless artifacts across the globe.

on the other hand how often things go missing in the British museum?

This is why I always donate my finished books to my local library. I don't need them and, if I want to read them again, I can always just go check it out from the library.

They are my human skulls I found them fair and square

That attitude gets retconed in the great circle.

where he explicitly says that it belongs in a museum and helps locals get their relics to keep safe in their museums. ie, it belongs in their museums.

good game overall

"I liked you better when you were a child I was grooming!"