this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1094 points (97.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16778 readers
2014 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ILaughBecauseFunny@feddit.dk 13 points 3 weeks ago

Issue: there are 27 different ways of writing a date.

Engineers: We most make a common standard that is unambiguous, easy to understand and can replace all of these.

Issue: there are 28 different ways of writing a date.

Joke aside, I really think the iso standard for dates is the superior one!

[–] callyral@pawb.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

2013-02-27 = 1984

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

@m_f@discuss.online this might be applicable to the farside as well

[–] m_f@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you mean the post titles? I've been using the same format as was used since before I took over posting, but if people want ISO format that works for me

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm all for ISO format. I can't imagine anyone having objections.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 3 weeks ago

Posting in ISO format now, we'll see if there's any objections

[–] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

I agree with the ISO approach, but unfortunately without mainstream adoption in a majority of countries it's just another standard.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 3 weeks ago

In the last company I work for, the department was created from zero, and my boss just let me take all the technical decisions so from the begging everything was wrote in ISO-8601. When I left it was just the way it was, if you try to use any other date format anywhere something is going to give you an error.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

I was going to comain until I realized that the fprmat is the one that I prefer.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

This is the way.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

2013-02-27 is a weird way of writing 1361923200

[–] xeekei@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just don't like to be forced to include the damn year everytime, and if you cut the year from ISO 8601 you get the american MM-DD order, which everybody hates.

I like DD/MM/YYYY. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 3 weeks ago

If it's just in casual conversation or emails DD/MM/YYYY is fine, but if you're naming documents or something in a professional setting, you should really always include the year anyway.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone should use date-time groups so we're all on the same page down to the second.

DDHHMMSSZmmmYY

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

%Y%m%dT%H%M%SZ

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 weeks ago

Working for a global clinical research company, DD-Mmm-YYYY is the easiest for everyone to understand and be on the same page. It's bad enough identifying which date you're capturing in metadata without also trying to juggle multiple date formats.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a Hungarian, I approve.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

As an American, I can't get people in my team to standardize their email signatures with correct spelling.

load more comments