A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.
Rules
Ah, Ford is back to saying the dumbest takes, instead of strangely agreeable things over the last few months.
Nature is healing.
Now we can get back to important municipal bike lanes and fast tracking a massive money pit tunnel instead of improving commuter rail transport.
So fucking annoying. Not that I believed he's reformed or anything, but I low-key hoped maybe something has stuck with him during his Trump heartbreak.
Ehh… If anything, his whole “Canada Is Not For Sale” thing only had me thinking that he’s been really consistent at being a populist. It’s right on brand.
Same
When he's got a clear focus and a big issue he can actually be alright.
When he's got time for all these frivolous make work type projects he's a real asswipe for no discernable reason.
I didn't vote for him but I was hopeful his election face would stick.
He's never alright because his motivations are corrupt. When he superficially seems to be doing something that aligns with your interests, it's just because he thinks that's the best angle to fuck you.
So why isn't he focused on the big issues facing Ontario right now like housing, the drug crisis, the cost of living? How does fighting bike lanes help anyone in Ontario?
He's waiting for the federal government to solve it for him. That way he can both get away with not spending much, and having someone to pin the blame on if things go sideways. So right now I think he's waiting for Carney to start these federal initiatives so he can play the partner.
Ah yes, what we need is more fascism.
Ford: We should elect judges like the US.
The US:
Gods, had this conversation with a bunch of Americans recently. They were trying to defend Elected judges and I just can't fathom why. Like why would I want someone who is less trained in the law adjudicating the process of the law? I would much rather have a system where you prove you understand and can carry out the code written into law by being selected by people who actually understand the function and process of the law otherwise lawyers are going to be able to pull all manner of fast ones and the judges won't recognize it as perversions of justice.
Elected judges always run on a "tough on crime" platform which creates incentives to throw more people in jail, make police worse and that system never, ever de-escalates. Not everything is made fairer by letting the public vote. Whenever a specialized knowledge set is in play the public is more of a nuisance when they try and put their oar in because they wouldn't understand enough to make an informed decision if they did nothing but study for a year. It would be like taking out a public vote on what medical surgerical proceedures for specific conditions should be the norm.
We need to collectively start understanding and championing the value of administrative branches of government, departments and agencies. Without experts in their fields being invested with reasonable powers our collective gooses will be cooked.
Also how many elected officials are actually good at their job? Why do we want more..?
It's the case that the entire premise of popular elections is kind of flawed system. Actual leadership and technical aptitude and the ability to play to a crowd are not really the same skills at all but we treat them like they are. It is a way to select someone who will make a bunch of promises that give them popular directives... But they aren't beholden to those promises at all.
Having a balance between groups which are hired and fired based on their technical ability to follow the directives and achieve the objectives set by elected bodies is crucial. That they persist through different governments means a continuity of service and the ability to commit to long term planning.
Honestly what most people don't seem to get is that any actual improvement made by a government takes almost a decade to pay off. Half the time they are dissatisfied with "broken promises" it is that those initiatives haven't had time to work because elections aren't that far apart. There's a certain amount of technical fleshing out, research before the fact, wrangling of contracts and trial and error in execution before anything does what it's supposed to do which often means an elected party is praised or damned by the actions of their predecessors.
I know you just meant public servants and I agree, but at the same time I would like to see staff-elected people in most workplace leadership positions. I think it's worth bringing up here that it would do a lot of good to have democracy and employee ownership within more organizations.
What right do you have Mr. Ford overstepping a municipal government elected by the people?
“We get democratically elected, and some judge slaps an injunction on bike lanes. Don’t the judges have anything better to do than worry about if we’re taking out bike lanes or not taking out bike lanes?” Ford said.
Yes they do have better things to do, but you're the one overstepping your power Doug. The people and politicians in Toronto fought for decades for those bike lanes and these judges are doing their job in protecting those decisions and the rights of people who depend on those lanes.