this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
124 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

9607 readers
1373 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did everyone notice how this election wiped out all the previous leaders and now we're faced with being introduced to a new crowd of political leaders.

Elizabeth May with the Green Party is the only one still standing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Pp did not resign and indicated he would keep going

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We shall see if the trope about conservatives eating their own is a justified stereotype then. We should, perhaps, look to the former leaders of the PC party who did not win elections to see how their fortunes fared.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

A lot of good things happened for the CPC under PP (unfortunately for the rest of us). Trudeau had to step down, the carbon tax is gone, the CPC gained seats and secured a record number of votes and the "far left" has been wrecked. While the liberal narrative is that PP fumbled a huge lead, I think cons see it more as carney resetting all the work PP did to discredit Trudeau, as trump interfering with the election (for his own gain, they think Carney is weak and will fold to trump) and they see the polls tightening as the election got closer (and him out preforming them) as a sign of PP's success. They think Carney will show his true colours soon enough and become as unpopular as Trudeau, allowing PP to win.

O'toole didn't acomplish much of anything during his time, the CPC mainly stayed the same or slightly declined despite liberals being steeped in controversy.

Sheer one his leadership race by a very small margin while the CPC (and right wing politics in general) was having an identity crisis, while they gained ground under him they did not make the strides they expected. Sheer also had that financial scandal.

I think PPs perceived performance is much closer to Harpers first loss. but even that isn't a great comparison IMO we are in new territory, exciting times and all that.

Disclaimer: I voted green, when I talk about good or bad here I'm putting myself in the shoes of a conservative voter, and I'm talking about perception as the right wing sees it, not necessarily fact. Their feelings don't care about your facts :D

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Resign or not, his career is finished with the conservatives. Every leader before him who failed at an election was removed, asked to step aside or pushed out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily. He did very well on the vote share front. There will be a leadership review, but I could see him getting a second shot once Carneys shine has worn off. Minority governments seldom last very long.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As someone who typically votes NDP, I’m fine with the idea. I didn’t especially dislike Singh, but I didn’t especially like him either.

Of course I don’t especially like Carney either but he was the safest choice to block PP and he did.

I want to see an NDP federal government someday, but Singh wasn’t really resonating with many people. Hopefully whoever fills the spot inspires more confidence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

that summarises my feelings. the NDP did a lot of good, but needed to hold the liberals feet to the fire more.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They supported the Liberals when they broke up union strikes, and when they did mass immigration after the cost of living exploded and we finally had wage pressure.

What is the point of the NDP at that point, just to prevent white people from speaking at rallies?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

A neighbor from the south would like to send his congratulations. Thank you for not following in our footsteps!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Every position of power needs term limits.

We can not allow our politicians to get comfortable ever.

It always leads to corruption

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Term limits are artificial. You like lame ducks?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

You probably want a permanent leader, don't you? It's ok to admit it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I like leashed dogs

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Politics should not be a lifelong career, and elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation... Therefore, I would institute a limit of two terms for members of Parliament" - Pierre Poilievre 1999

"Politics should not be a lifelong career, and elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation... Therefore, I would institute a limit of two terms for members of Parliament" - Pierre Poilievre 1999

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

How did I go a whole election cycle without seeing this?

load more comments
view more: next ›