this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
845 points (98.5% liked)

linuxmemes

24675 readers
1398 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    (page 2) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    jesus I feel old, and I am only in my 30s. I remember not having apt. How young are linux users nowadays?

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    jesus I feel old, and I am only in my 30s. I remember not having apt. How young are linux users nowadays?

    Well... how old were you when you got your first computer? That young.

    load more comments (11 replies)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 161 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    apt is a newer, more user-friendly front-end for apt-get and apt-cache.

    apt = combines commands like install, remove, update, upgrade into one tool, with prettier output

    #apt-get = older, lower-level, more script-friendly For normal use, just use apt now. For scripting where 100% backward compatibility matters, use apt-get.

    [–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    TIL apt isn't literally the same thing as apt-get

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    But apt-get also has install, remove, update and upgrade...

    [–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Yes, but apt-get is missing search for instance, because that relates to the cache, so apt-cache provides it.

    apt combines all those often used commands, and provides a nicer shell presentation.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

    I came in for the jokes but all I found was helpful responses. Did I get the Nazi virus from Reddit?

    [–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    🎡

    APT, APT, APT, APT

    Just meet me at the...

    🎡

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure it's basicaly

    alias apt='apt-get'
    
    [–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

    There is the subtle difference that the output if apt-get is optimized for automations

    Apt has pretty outputs with colors etc

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    ~~Can apt-get refresh package list?~~

    Edit: yes...yes it can. I was confused.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Yes, apt-get update is, to the best of my knowledge, functionally identical to apt update.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

    D'oh, I'm a doofus


    it's search that I was thinking of (apt-cache search, not apt-get search).

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

    Nala gang rise up!

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Isn't this explained in the manpages for apt(8) and apt-get(8)?

    Do people don't read their manuals anymore?

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

    Anymore? Where do you think RTFM comes from, people never read the manual.

    [–] [email protected] 280 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    These days, apt is for humans whereas apt-get is for scripts. apt's output is designed for humans and may change between releases, whereas apt-get is guaranteed to remain consistent to avoid breaking scripts.

    apt combines several commands together. For example, you can use it to install packages from both repos and local files (e.g. apt install ./foo.deb) whereas apt-get is only for packages from repos and you'd need to use dpkg for local packages.

    [–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (3 children)
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    Or a long time Debian user from before the apt command!

    [–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    You forgot to "beep boop." Please report for debugging.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Will they take me off the cron schedule?? I'm scared

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    You and me both, makes sense though for me LMAO

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

    I always struggled with captchas and now I know why.

    [–] [email protected] 75 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Huh TIL.

    I never considered trying to install a package from a local file through apt, but always dpkg. End result is the same of course. The web suggests dpkg rather than apt as well ( or at least the pages I ended up on ).

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

    apt and apt-get both use dpkg internally, but these days it's essentially seen as an implementation detail that regular users don't need to know about.

    dpkg doesn't resolve dependencies (that's a feature of apt) which means that if you install a Debian package with dpkg, you'll have to manually install all dependencies first, and they won't be marked as automatically installed (so autoremove won't remove them if they're not needed any more). Using apt solves that.

    The web suggests dpkg because either the articles are old, or they're based on outdated knowledge :)

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Discord is distributed as a .Deb if you don't use flatpak because they can't be bothered to set up a repo.

    The very useful thing about local file install is that unlike dpkg, apt will install dependencies automatically

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

    And here I am using gdebi for those kinds of local packages...

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

    Same with Zoom.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Thats weird, they do have an arch official package and that's the one they usually don't make because AUR is a thing. Have you checked lately?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I have checked on every new update because their fuckass client apparently can't update itself in big 2025 and instead just opens your browser to the download url because that'll convince people that Linux is great.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Updating itself isn't really the Linux way of things. The Linux way is to have a centralised place like pacman or apt and to download everything at once. Every app having their own download and update system sounds like a nightmare.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    An "official" arch package? The arch package is packaged by the arch maintainers. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/discord

    The maintainers of the PKGBUILD are all arch maintainers, which just downloads the generic .tar.gz file discord provides and puts it in all the places you need for you.

    The "official" arch packages are just PKGBUILDs like the AUR, except prebuilt, managed (and signed) by the arch team.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    I didn't know, thanks! I guess in hindsight I meant "official" as in, it's not just some rando, I can trust it won't break, and I don't have to manually download the stuff every time xD

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

    Console chiding me every time I use apt-get out of habit because it’s deprecated now…

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

    I use them one after another just to be sure I'm up-to-date.

    load more comments
    view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί