this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2840 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

His face says "your tits aren't big enough for me to put up with all this screaming."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

This is basically the storyline of a new book I just read - The Canopy Keepers by Veronica Henry

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This kid looks like a young Tom holland

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tom Holland already looks like a young Tom Holland though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

A young....er? (If that's possible) Tom Holland.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Y'all mf'ers need to read The Secret Life of Plants. It's fascinating.

It's from the 1970s or 80s, and it talks about this stuff in extreme depth - plant communication, plants understanding their environment... Long range communication & telepathic plants...

You gotta understand, there's absolutely zero science to it -- TSLoP is richly detailed with unconfirmed anecdotal evidence, some lady said this, a man from Tucson said this other thing, etc. If it was real, it would be world changing, but, at this point, it's a pretty crazy claim that would need some pretty crazy evidence.

But it's still fascinating -- both from it's own kayfabe, like, imagine a world in which this was real -- and in terms of "conspiracy theories" -- is not a conspiracy but it's clear bullshit so the who and why of it's believers is interesting. Because it's not like most conspiracies, which usually eventually lead back to antisemitic and Christian supremacist stuff. TSLoP is a legit leftist conspiracy, all its own thing.

So, if you see The Secret Life of Plants at a used bookstore for a couple dollars, pick it up, it's really neat.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I like this comment for many reasons, but I'll mention just that I have never heard the word "kayfabe" until today and I love it!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

I hadn't heard it either until FD Signifier used it in a video. I guess it originally referred to the "in universe" fiction of professional wrestling, but FD took it out of that context and now I use it all the time -- well, it doesn't come up that often, but it's a concept that's needed a word for a while now... Especially now that "alternative facts" are becoming so prevalent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

This comment is the definition of joie de vivre.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The mycorrhizal networks are a real phenomenon, and as recently as 2016 were confirmed to share resources between trees.

Researchers exposed certain trees to a specific carbon isotope and found their unfed neighbors were processing that specific isotope despite not being exposed.

We've also found that many plants generate interacting electrical fields that help promote pollination and may indicate to pollinators which plants are ready to be harvested.

We've also found, by sequencing fungal DNA, that mother trees do have a resource sharing preference for their direct offspring.

We don't have hard evidence for direct communication between trees, in the sense that we don't speak tree. We do have hard evidence that they share resources, have preferences, express pain signals externally and other plants react, and can indicate information to other species.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

A few years ago, a group of giraffes were placed in a field surrounded by enough acacia trees to ensure their food, but after a short time the giraffes began to get sick. The cause is the acacias. These, when the giraffe eats its shoots, releases a toxic substance to the other shoots that makes them toxic and also sends signals to the surrounding acacias that also make them toxic. The giraffes, therefore, in freedom, after eating from an acacia, move to others of several km to continue in these, but this in an enclosure was not possible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Thank you for taking the time to comment in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the tip, I’ll keep an eye out for it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

For some updated information on the continued research into plant communication, I would suggest a video by Anton Petrov

Mindblowing Video of Plants Talking to Each Other In Real Time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

But it helps me anthropomorphize them into ents so it must be true

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm sorry to say that that is most likely a myth that scientists have been hyping each other up about.

https://www.sciencealert.com/does-a-vast-network-of-fungi-connect-forests-heres-what-we-know

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just want to point out that this source indicates researchers reviewed 1500 papers on the topic and found that unsupported claims had doubled.

However, they never indicate the number or give a percentage of those 1500 papers that featured unsupported claims.

So is it doubling from 2 to 4, or from 700 to 1400? Because that's a major difference.

This is a problem with AI articles on science. They skim other AI articles and repeat without bringing all the important facts with them. Then we get dozens of results for one claim about science, with only maybe one or two original sources.

Then the idea spreads through reddit or whatever forum you prefer.

We know trees share resources, that they have been demonstrated to signal pain and danger to other plants, that they signal food availability to pollinators via electromagnetic fields. We have had hard evidence for all of this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Yes? Hard evidence? Where?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting hypothesis run amok because a core group of biologists WANTED it to be true so badly.

There's a GREAT episode (ep. 425) from the In Defense of Plants podcast that covers the misinformation and misunderstanding perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Thanks! I’ve listen to a couple of those. The info is good, but there’s something a little off-putting about the guy’s delivery. Not sure what it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

David Attenborough said it, opinion discarded

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

You ever watch any good nature docs?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

..damn, the Borough at work again!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

So the Lorax is a myconid?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›