this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2967 readers
51 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

[email protected]

[email protected]

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Republicans would have turned in Anne Frank. This is truly some gestapo shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Can't wait to hear people like Alex Jones defend this. Can't wait for every sovcit to defend this. Can't wait for every Gadsden flag flag and bumper sticker to defend this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MA~~G~~NA Make America Nazi again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember when democrats got all heated about G Gordon Liddy saying “if the feds come to your door, shoot them in the head” (to account for body armor)?

I don’t know why that popped into my head just now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Don't do that.

Shoot them in the dick.

Seriously.

The lower abdomen is chock full o' arteries, and a hit on the pelvis is going to instantly drop someone; you can't walk with a pelvis that's been shattered by a 9mm. It's also generally an easier target.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Send bachelors.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

They absolutely can’t.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

weird question, do i have to be black to join the black panthers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can buy a gun and practice. Start a club with your neighbors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Hitler actually changed the constitution to get his fascism off the ground, in this case the courts are apparently useless, so they don’t even have do that!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections

...That's not how the relationship between laws and the Constitution works.

Journalists don't need to just print both sides arguments and throw their hands up like determining truth is beyond them. Don't print lies and falsehoods without immediately pointing out they're lies and falsehoods. They didn't find a glitch in the system that maybe the courts will patch eventually, they're making up unlawful justifications to violate constitutional rights. Yeah, constitutional rights aren't going to save you from the violation, but we all need to know and establish that it's a violation in advance. ICE could always enter your home without a warrant, they just couldn't do it legally, and a memo from fascist Barbie hasn't changed that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Still waiting on those nuts to step up to what they said they were keeping guns for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

No no those guns were to make sure they don't end up on the bottom.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In California remember you have Castle Doctrine. Protecting yourself, your home, and property from unwarranted unannounced invasions from ANYONE allows you to use deadly force if available

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

...Except cops. You do not have a legal right to resist illegal actions by police. The ONLY state where that's a legal right is Indiana. Look, I get it, you should have that right everywhere, but if you shoot a cop that's illegally breaking into your home, you will be arrested, charged, and convicted, IF you survive. And you probably won't.

Should you shoot them anyways? Absolutely. Just understand what the result will be.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Guess I need to move to CA.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait. CA allows the Castle Doctrine?

A quick search shows it does. I'll be damned.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'll be damned as well.

Worth noting for any Californians that it u-turns if the person stops being a threat. If you threaten and they run away, you're now in the wrong if you shoot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's true pretty much everywhere. Shooting someone in the back will almost always get you charged, unless you're a cop.

Generally speaking--and I'm not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer, and you should ask a criminal defense attorney in your state for specifics--you can use force, including lethal force, to protect your life if you have reasonable fear for your life or safety. Generally speaking, if someone is running away from you, they're no longer a direct threat, and therefore you can't use force. Similarly, if you are in a reasonable fear for your life, and you shoot someone, you can not kick them while they're bleeding on the ground.

I believe all states have some form of Castle Doctrine. Some states have a duty to retreat if you aren't in your home/car, e.g., you have to attempt to escape first. Some states require you to use proportionate force; if they have a baseball bat, you may not be allowed to use a firearm. Know the laws specific to your state.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Wait...that's not true everywhere?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Weird place to reference Magnitude from Community but okay.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

That’s going to go really well for everyone in a country with so many people packing heat all the time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I'm scared of migrants hiding in my closet and under my bed please protect me ICE.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

🔫

Lol, lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

On the path to Hitlerism just an excuse so they can disappear anyone against the facist party

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Enjoy your freedumb America. You voted for this insanity. Fucking morons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I mean, they can enter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah uhm the word "migrants" is written on a removable label ... fill in whichever citizen category you want to drag out of their houses...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

You don't fill in labels, you're sorting punch cards.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›