this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
694 points (99.9% liked)

Privacy

2037 readers
122 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No reposting of news that was already posted
  4. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  5. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

I imagine this has been underway since whenever that legal kerfluffle in India happened

[–] [email protected] 89 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (13 children)

I'll note too that even absent Heritage Foundation threats, this can be useful to spur development of the project (i.e. for people who don't want a permanent account but don't feel comfortable having their IP permanently, publicly attached to edits). Probably the reason it hasn't been done in the past is it's almost certainly going to make it easier for bad actors to fly under the radar. Before, you either had to show your IP address (which can reveal your location and will usually uniquely identify who edited something for at least a little bit; you also can't use a VPN without special permission) or you had to register a single account (where if you created multiple, a sockpuppet investigation would often find out).

So there's an inherent trade-off, but I think right-wing threats of stochastic terrorism really tipped the scales.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›