this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
1188 points (96.0% liked)

memes

14950 readers
4176 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I worked on a project for Rheinmetall for a bit and feel just fine about it. I would never work in advertising though. What a disgusting industry that destroys minds and societies.

I would still prefer defense industry over advertising or fossil fuels for example.

[–] Kobie123@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

I don’t work for a defence contractor, but i’ll probably be going to hell anyway since I picked up making/racing drones as a hobby specifically so i have some way of raising hell if my country is ever invaded.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 month ago

It would've been better if you cropped out the useless comment

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We’re all guilty and we should all go on strike

[–] jjfolken@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Defense contractor... Strike... I see what you did there

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

there is a misunderstanding of the MIC, they profit of weapons, not death. they dont like war, it means instability, supplychains get stressed and stuff gets expansive, asswell as their stuff gets destroyed and may shows ineffective. they like the idea of war. they want country A and B have and armsrace and get the expansive fancy stuff but never fire at each other. nor every corpo is vault tec.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

Uh... No. They don't like war here, they love a war on the other side of the planet, where either we're punching down on a county they don't do much with or backing another country

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Would it be like a spectrum with weapons being a cardinal sin, and cotton swabs and morphine a thing you can only do on lent? Would weapon makers be in a lower circle, logistics in the middle, and those on the periphery of the military apparatus go to purgatory?

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If I worked for a defence contractor, I would make the most accurate weapons in the world. Why? Because when the people who fired those weapons are up in court and they go "Oh well I didn't MEAN to hit that hospital, the bomb just didn't hit its intended target", the prosecutor can go "Nonsense! Those are the most accurate weapons in the world. They ONLY hit what you intended to hit with as much force as you wanted to hit it with!".

The weapons are gonna get built, I'd rather there be no ambiguity in how they get used. It's not like WW2 where Bomber Command was like "Here's the dockyards we want to blow up, and a bajillion tonnes of bombs to blow it up with", and then the bombers flatten half a city just trying to hit the docks and miss every single time because it's cloudy, or hit an entirely different city because they got lost on the way!. You only have to look at Russia's "throw enough artillery shells at the area until it's completely flat" approach to war to know what happens when you haven't got precision munitions, or not enough of them.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But if you look at the actual reality of what happens, those bombs are still used to kill civilians with no repercussions.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bombs are going to be used to kill civilians anyway. Would you rather their deaths be intentional or accidental? Either way a bomb is going to go off, the best you can do is ensure the bomb hits where the person dropping it intended. That way, if it's a civilian, the person dropping the bomb has no deniability because they hit exactly what they intended to hit.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah. I just won't help bomb civilians at all. I can't always control whether others help bomb civilians, but I can always control whether I help bomb civilians. Civilian deaths are 99% intentional. They are decided before the bomb is deployed. You will make the bombs knowing they will be used immorally.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not always immorally. Sometimes they kill Russians (soldiers).

[–] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

I'd say depends on which one and what lobby work they have done. If it is from the US or Russia, it is probably a big no-no.

If it is a European or South American defense contractor or weapons manufacturer, it varies.

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

damn it's true

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, I spent the last 20 years developing a very particular kind of chemical agent that is tailor made to dissolve an eight-year-old's testicles. But I assure you we only intend to use it in self-defense.

I have no idea how the Israelis got seventy of them.

load more comments