this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
181 points (99.5% liked)

World News

45863 readers
2049 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

I'll eat my hat if they do that

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, I completely agree with Agnès Callamard here.

“A rights respecting break-up of Google’s monopolistic hold could be an important first step towards an online world that respects human rights. By eroding the dominance of a single corporation and weakening Google’s control over our data, it makes space that must be filled by actors committed to upholding human rights.”

"Google’s current model thrives on harvesting, analysing, sharing with others and profiting from people’s personal data. This toxic, surveillance-based approach – shared by other Big Tech companies including Meta and TikTok – undermines the right to privacy and has given Google sheer market dominance, leaving no space for alternatives which respect our rights."

They should have fixed that before Trump 2.0! But I'm sure Google/Alphabet lawyers knew that drawing things out might benefit them.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or just skip Google alltogether

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actively, yes. A big step I encourage everybody to take. Like moving out of your parents' house for the first time.

Passively - close to impossible. It has, after all, a monopoly on many aspects of the www.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't see it as impossible at all. But it is indeed inconvenient and may even cost some money.

But if it was as straightforward as just changing the TV channel, everyone would have done it already.

Having values and acting on them does cost. It is when we are willing to cope with those costs (financial or/and practical) that we stand our ground. Not when we don't feel it. In that case it would just be a logical choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t see it as impossible at all.

Well I said "close to". Are you sure you can use the www without ever connecting to some google server? Ads, analytics, the infamous tagmanger etc.?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago

Not without going completely off the grid no. But there is a big difference from that, and actively using their services or even paying them money.

Simply privacy tools will anonymize your use of the internet, but actively avoiding the use of any google services, is the first big step

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Easier said than done, even with alternatives. It's everywhere

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know! For me, the hardest part was Google photos, that i eventually replaced with ente. But there is a reason why they have a market monopoly. By definition, it makes it difficult to find alternatives. But its possible!

I now only use them when Qwant does not give satisfying results. Kagi is good too, although i have recently replaced it with qwant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you use for Maps? I am happy with a combination of Mappy and HereWeGo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm mostly using herewego. I believe that I tried mappy but it didn't have traffic updates for my region? Not sure 🤔 I went through so many!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks! I usually try to use Organic Maps, but Here We Go seems to be very nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oooh, Organic Maps works well at least local to me, thanks for the recommendation.

If i can drop Google Maps, the only Google related things I would still be using are Revanced Youtube and GrapheneOS.

Search I moved to Ecosia which is still Bing. Hopefully not for much longer given their most recent relevant announcement about making their own euro indexer/engine teaming up with Qwant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 minutes ago

I love organic maps! I used Google when organic wasn't able to find certain addresses. I travel for work and sometimes organic isn't great for weird places.

I use PipePipe for YouTube. I really like that app. I haven't tried Revanced Youtube.

Oh nice. I primarily use DuckDuckGo, but I do use Leta occasionally. I'll have to check Qwant out as well. Thanks!