this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
744 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

70266 readers
3942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They'll have to pay for the cellular connection themselves because I'm not gonna enter my wifi password into the tv lol. Been using a pc hooked up to the screen for ages. Screw "smart tv" features, slow and inconvenient as hell.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

God, I wish we kept our CRT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

This is why I switched to sceptre, they're good quality, low cost, dumb displays.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd rather just not have a tv

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Just don't connect it to the internet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

So glad I haven't got a LGtv, I'd have to buy a sledgehammer as well.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I rooted my 65" LG TV, and put a pi-hole in front of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Lucky Cream and Goldstar (the L and G in LG) would be ashamed of this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Viewer emotions will anger and frustration at their ads.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Holy shit there were so many ads in that article that I just stopped reading. It sucks LG is going down this route. They make really nice displays but now I dont ever want to buy an LG tv if its spying on me to serve me these ‘better’ ads. Fuck advertising. Its turned into a complete monster

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It's just the addition of "AI". We've been doing the same thing for a long time. I used to work for an advertising data company over a decade ago, and they filtered all the ads for one of the big channels' streaming services in exactly the same way just with regular algorithms rather than AI. It's what would make ads for men's razors appear in the middle of a soap opera at 11PM because it knew the user was a man getting home from the pub.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can't hardly even buy computer monitors without them anymore either. Every one of the higher end Samsung or LG monitors is starting to include "smart" bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can probably just cover the camera with tape or smth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's not talking about tracking emotions from looking at the viewer, it's tracking the emotions in the script of the thing they're watching, so it knows what they like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't connect a computer monitor to the internet?...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good that there's Pi-hole or similar solutions. Have both LG and Samsung at home and if I see what Pi-hole drops and how talkative both vendor TVs are... bloody hell! Don't use the stock functions anyway, Apple TVs are doing there job here so I took them offline a while ago. Anyway, the whole industry is turning into a completely wrong direction...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

does not worth anything nowadays. they'll just retry with 8.8.8.8, a DoH service or something else. pretty sure they can also do without DNS, like chinese cameras use connections that cannot be blocked with a hosts file because they are going directly to a preprogrammed IP

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Echoes back to the Facebook leaker

There's no bar too low except that which receives continuous ceaseless push back against people who push things like this.

There isn't enough push back to matter. So the bar lowers.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can we please ban electronic advertising already? And billboards? Society would be better off without them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If we ban people from "earning" over a certain amount, they'll get round it through "gifts" or exchange in-kind or something, right? Same with ads. If we ban them, then product placement with plausible deniability will be rife, paid through essentially money-laundering methods, worse than it is now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yikes, don’t ever wank in front of your TV.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Or wank lots in front of the TV. Make the collected data useless.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The TVs are reporting a lot of anger. Add more cameras!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Gee, boss. Says here 87% of viewers were angry with the TV for spying on them."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Cool one more reason I’ll never connect my display to the internet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah. Emotionally raping people is super ethical

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›