this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZedong

4533 readers
4 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Hey speaking of apartments, this bozo leaves out what happened to GDR citizens immediately after reunification. Anyone in the FRG could make a claim on property in the East that was “taken” from them or their ancestors in the process of Germany being divided. At one point, over half of all residential dwellings in the East were claimed by leeches in the West. Even though a lot of claims didn’t end in evictions, so many GDR citizens had to live under the threat of being made homeless (and many were).

You had to wait for a car but it’s not like in the US where a car is a mandatory (and incredibly expensive) requirement to live. They had public transport. And part of the reason they had to wait so long (and also why bananas et al were hard to come by) is that the capitalist world tried to strangle the economies of the Eastern Bloc as much as possible.

Also, the Stasi didn’t come after you just for complaining about the government. Lots of people complained. They came after you if they suspected you were on CIA or BRD payroll, or were a capitalist wrecker, or a fash, etc. Good faith complaints were fine. The book I cite in the source below has an opinion poll that was made shortly after reunification. Former GDR citizens responded to what they liked the least about life in the GDR, and the Stasi were pretty low on the list. Travel limitations were clearly #1 IIRC, but that can’t be blamed entirely on the GDR as the capitalist west also placed restrictions on the travel of GDR citizens.

Source: Stasi State or Socialist Paradise. Haven’t read any Victor Grossman but he’s pretty great on this subject, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You had to wait for a car but it’s not like in the US where a car is a mandatory (and incredibly expensive) requirement to live

In capitalist Singapore right now there is a $10,000 tax on owning a car and not many people do for this reason (on the grounds that Singapore's infrastructure couldn't work if it had to accomodate everyone in the city having a car)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That seems cool and good if people can work without a car anyway

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Yeah from what the guy was telling me they have pretty extensive public transport. Land there is just too expensive to waste on car parks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Keep in mind, about that line where he says they made DDR the largest prison on Earth, just to keep in perspective: the USA, since 1970, has quintupled its incarcerated population, currently making up about 1/5 of the world’s prison population.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic" -J. V. Džugašvili

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Funny story. The first time I read that quote was from Call of Duty 2. I was pretty apolitical and ignorant about history. I didn't have some blanket negative view of Stalin back then so I actually liked the quote. I didn't think it was negative or some evil maniac giggling about how he could kill millions because it was a statistic. I thought he was lamenting the fact that the death of one 'great' figure would be treated as a tragedy and the deaths of millions (his countrymen) would be treated as a statistic. The Georgian poet strikes again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The one from Mao about people becoming fertilizer is true but taken wildly out of context. He was basically talking about the circle of life (emphasis mine):

Partial splits are normal. Since last year, splits occurred within the leadership group in half of the provinces in the nation. Take the human body for instance. Everyday hair and skin are coming off. It is the death of a part of the cells. From infancy on, a part of the cells will die. It benefits growth. Without such destruction, man cannot exist. It would have been impossible if men did not die since the time of Confucius. Death has benefits; fertilizer is created. You say you don’t want to become fertilizer, but actually you will. You must be mentally prepared. Partial splits occur everyday. There will always be splits and destruction. The absence of splits is detrimental to development. Destruction in entirety is also a historical inevitability. As a whole, the party and the state, serving as the tools of the class struggle, will also perish. But before the completion of its historical mission, we must consolidate it. We do not hope for splits, but we must be prepared. Without preparation, there will be splits. With preparation, we will avoid big splits. Large and medium splits are temporary.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-8/mswv8_23.htm

Edit: I fixed a typo where an exclamation mark was added incorrectly

I have seen the bold part, or sometimes even the first half, taken completely out of context to be about the famine that only started the following year.

As an aside, Mao's cadence is so funny, though it might be in translation. Just look at that second sentence, "You say you don't want to become fertilizer, but actually you will."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

i cant with this people, they are the real spoiled ones taking everything they got in socialist states for granted and complain how hard they had it: "uh it was so hard, we did not have oranges? Can you believe that??? how can a society possibly function without oranges, literally 1984" I give you the choice:

A: live in a society where human rights like housing, food and clothing are treated as such and the vast majority of peoples needs are met (no oranges)

or

B: live in a society where you need to pay for your human rights and where only the rich can carefree finance their lives without sinking in unpayable debt while homeless people roam the streets and get beaten by the police for being poor (with oranges)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Apparently the "2/3 society" was a hotly discussed topic in the late GDR, because liberals went that "if only 2/3 of the society lives well at the expense of getting everything to run well, then it's worth pursuing."

They got what they wanted.

A nationalistic "the state was supposed to take care of me, but I am unhappy. This is the lazy people's fault" was very popular in the 80s - east AND west.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

I’ve got the second one now and I still can’t afford fresh oranges usually smh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

one of the great baffling issues of the later soviet union was how little people appreciated things like safety nets, housing, security in old age. And how much people would really like the new phone

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

i mean you had all of capitalism pumping out propaganda for decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The section in Blackshirts and Reds where he details what it was like for people in former Soviet countries when they realized they had been duped by capitalist propaganda and lost all those things they took for granted was really fucking sad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

well the fall of the soviet union was really sad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Hot take: I agree

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

…waited 10–12 years for a car and it wasn't cheap…

Meanwhile, in capitalism, cars are so cheap that so many car 'owners' get into a debt that lasts longer than the car. Some of them even find out that after weeks or months of payments, their credit application can be refused and the car can still be taken off them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Yeah that part confused the hell out of me. Cars over here can cost more than a small house.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Stasi also forced you to do this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

They were also consistently ahead of the "BRD" regarding LGBT rights. The reason gay sex was finally completely legalised in all of Germany was that it would be bad press for the "BRD" regime to take away rights from east German LGBT people when they made a new criminal code to go with the annexation of the GDR.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

well they weren't forcing people to do that and if they were it would be weird

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Yes thats the point, it was sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Knowing up-yours-woke-moralists cultists, the thought of women enjoying sex outside of transactional obligations is intimidating to them and makes them uneasy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

The feminist part of our party (we're all feminist, just this part is run by women focussing on women specifically) is focussing on sex under socialism now and it gets some people's panties in a twist for sure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Literally clicked into this thread to say, 'the world's largest prison but the greatest sex on earth and a dope flag.'

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Communism bad because no oranges and bananas!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That’s literally the pop-history definition here why the gdr failed because of muh bananas, jeans and coffee.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

It’s the history written by the labor aristocrats and petite bourgeoisie who thought they’d make out better under capitalism than socialism. It ignores the many millions of working class individuals who suffered and died and who would gladly take security and safety over fucking oranges. But we never hear their stories in the west. We only hear from businessmen, journalists, academics etc who decry “no oranges” and ignore the suffering of the masses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How long does something have to exist before it's not considered a failure? Or is everything a failure and always was if it collapsed eventually?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Only socialism. Anything else isn't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

man, screw bananas. if we can't have bananas without absolutely screwing over Guatemala or Colombia or whoever, we just shouldn't have them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why there has to be a dichotomy. In a communist world, no reason we couldn't fairly compensate workers and manage the environment for growing bananas.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

That's what the bananas want you to think. But they're working with the dolphins and elephants to bring us all down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

shit fruit anyway, fuck exploitation sugar penises give me blueberries all day