this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1718 points (99.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

34414 readers
981 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People are just going to have to re-learn just how fucking scary the measles and polio are, I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's still some pro-asbestos people, so it didn't go away 100%. I remember reading a completely mental Conservapedia article blaming 9/11 on not using asbestos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The use of it in the US was banned only last year and I'm not aware of there having been such movement.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Donald Trump has already called asbestos "100% safe". His cultist followers will eagerly become pro-asbestos if he tells them to. And he will tell them to if someone pays him enough to tell them so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I would 100% agree with you with where I live, Alberta Canada.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If there wasn't such a huge amount of money in remediation, you'd likely still have them now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

'Bestos saved my buddy's life in 'Nam, man.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 month ago

I used to live in a city called Asbestos, the mine was closed back in 2012 and older folks are still angry about it, they'll even tell you that the workers handling it weren't in worse health than anyone else in the city... The worst part is that it was banned in the construction industry 30 years prior, so they kept exploiting the mine only to export it to countries that hadn't banned it, even if it meant killing people there...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We should just let them bring all these things back, make the southeast US a mecca for dinks that want raw milk, lead paint, asbestos insulation, and derailed trains pumping vinyl chloride into a biodome.

Entice them to move there by saying something like, "The south is rising again, make sure you get in there before they close the doors!"

This would suck though, I would hate not to be able to go to the Smokeys ever again or see the Everglades.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In fact, the industry did sue and win a lawsuit in 1991 narrowing the range of asbestos compounds banned by the EPA. There have always been huge waves of resistance to every harmful compound banned by the government, from leaded gas to cigarettes to chlorofluorocarbons that harmed the ozone layer. The difference is that the present consolidation of wealth in the hands of a small group of billionaires, who control a consolidating group of media corporations, allows for unprecedented ability to control public opinion. Meanwhile, the amount of junk information floating around in social media, and failing public education, has disordered our systems of discourse. There is much more limited ability to vet quality sources of information, leaving people to worry more about fictional chemtrails than about the very real pesticides in their food

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Leaded gas still isn't banned. Small airplanes still use it, and homes around airfields (including mine, which my family lived in before the airfield) are contaminated with lead. My daughter failed her 12 month lead test because of it despite us excluding her from outdoor activities in our neighborhood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Changed it a little.

In fact, the industry did sue and win a lawsuit in 1991 narrowing the range of profits banned by the EPA. There have always been huge waves of resistance to every profitable compound banned by the government, from leaded gas to cigarettes to chlorofluorocarbons that harmed the ozone layer.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›