It bugs me that this is labeled "All Americans" and "Republicans". Should be "Republicans" and "everyone else that's not a moron".
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
808 points (98.7% liked)
Political Memes
8097 readers
2795 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But that’s not what the data is showing. It is all Americans.
Right, that's what I'm saying. Presenting the data that way makes no sense. Show two mutually exclusive groups so we can see the differences. They're showing A vs A+B. Just give us A vs B.
Oh well the way you phrased this is confusing to me. Since you mentioned the labels specifically. Those are accurate.
In terms of the data presented, maybe you’re right that this would have been more useful to us but I assume the creator had some reason for choosing those metrics that made sense in context.
Something, something Rawls' Veil of Ignorance something.
Subtext: Americans would be fine with minorities working in factories.
But they also want the minorities all deported... or imprisoned.
Wait, they want to use prison labor, don't they. We're just taking this back to slave labor again.
Throw in a bunch of "seize the means" and I’ll vote for the right.
I'm guessing the people commenting don't work in a factory.
It's Taco Bell wages with lung cancer air and no air conditioning. It's not better for anyone. I work in one that makes a "world famous" product rich people absolutely love. They still look to hire people at $17/hr in a VHCOL area....
Fucking real. Capatalism needs these job, not humans.
Yup. The rose coloured glasses folks think manufacturing jobs provided good pay, when it was union jobs that did that. And you can turn any industry into a unionized industry with enough ~~fire~~ effort.
load more comments
(3 replies)
My partner would 100% be happier working in a factory than in fast food. Right now he's in the hospital kitchen which is the next best thing.
I think America would be better if nursing assistant was a job people could just do for the rest of their career instead of calling it a "student job" so they can justify paying peanuts. Hell they're doing that with nurses now too, everybody's going to NP or CRNA school; then who the hell is gonna flip granny? You gotta flip that bird 6 times a shift like a lil pancake just so she doesn't wear a hole in her saggy lil tush! Depressed wages are pushing everybody outta direct care so they can eat, and then there's nobody left to actually provide direct care! And telework jobs like case management and utilization review which wouldn't even exist if insurance companies no longer existed, which would be a deep heresy against capitalism. Granny can probably still call the doctor and a cab for herself but who the hell gonna load her actual body into the car? Even when medicaid covers the bill uber ain't gonna let their drivers take liability for anything more than putting her bag in the back seat for her.
Revalue direct-care Healthcare workers 2025!
I do understand the allure of "we should make things again", and the security implications of maintaining a local manufacturing capacity and workforce - but I think people from advanced economies are incredibly myopic about what it actually looks like to develop that capacity back.
It'll be difficult for the US to compete on price with countries like China, which have a much better developed manufacturing sector and lower wages / cost of living, even with steep tariffs applied to inflate the prices of imported goods.
They'd probably have to subsidise production in the short-term, and invest heavily in capital to automate production to the greatest extent possible so as to avoid needing to ask Americans to accept lower living standards to stand a chance.
I actually think the security guarantee is an illusion. If we are all dependent on one another we’re less likely to go to war. Conversely, If all countries start competing over the same resources the chances of war increase
I meant security less in the armed conflict sense, more in the less vulnerable to disruption sense. It does make sense to retain a food production sector, and a manufacturing sector for important goods like pharmaceuticals - because countries are likely to prioritise themselves in times of scarcity or crisis. I agree that interdependence is good for avoiding conflict.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Another thing to consider with manufacturing is logistics, there are so many things that have to come together to manufacture a single doohicky.
Buying land near a transit hub is expensive so you try to buy land in a rural area, but then how do you get it shipped to you while maintaining reasonable prices so you can stay competitive? Ground transit is fine as long as petrol prices are low, but most manufacturing is putting together other goods, which largely come from other countries.
So you.. start a mine to get whatever you need? Just grab a pickaxe and start digging I guess, otherwise it doesn't matter what you make the prices will be 10x china's because the costs are outrageous.
I mean, that's not necessarily bad, right? 80% people think that it would be better for them if someone worked in a factory and 25% think it would be better if they personally worked in a factory. So, if the 25% get a chance to work in a factory, they're satisfied and the 80% is satisfied as well.
I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about
Like 25% of the Chinese workforce is in manufacturing (roughly) but they’ve got the infrastructure and have put decades into systems to build what they have.
America would be building it from the ground up. Automation systems take time to iron out kinks and cost a lot up front.
And all this to find out that American made is just a meaningless phrase because it’s not about where an item is physically made, it’s about standards to which the items construction is dictated. China can make things of extremely high quality. They’re just consistently tasked to make things by cutting as many corners as possible to maximize profits at the expense of consumers. Those same shitty practices applied to American manufacturing will result in “made in America” shit. Case in point you can find plenty of stuff currently manufactured in America that is total shit. You can find stuff manufactured in America that is high quality and you can find stuff manufactured in China that is high quality. The country of manufacture is meaningless and this pissing match is pointless
I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about
American manufacturing has been on a consistently upward trajectory and has never been higher. Many things made in America either are highly skilled, highly automated, or both. The hubbub about "bringing manufacturing back" is all just a smokescreen to redirect the anger from Americans who used to have stable, well paying, union factory jobs, who never will have one again.
_and_Manufacturing_Employment.png){kind=link}
I'm not disagreeing, sorry if that was the impression, I was merely pointing out that the passive-agressive "someone's American dream, just not mine" does not really apply to the graph.
It looks like an emperor's new clothes scenario to me. People agree with each other that the US should manufacture more because they have picked up that that's the respectable answer; not because they see any actual sense in it.
Or maybe it's some sort of nostalgia. I guess people used to say that more people should work in agriculture, because that was somehow their idea of a proper, wholesome country.
People who play medievalist games somehow never pretend to be serfs or farm-hands.
There are a few areas where you would want manufacturing in the country. Defense, some medical supplies, ... Just in case things go bad, you'd want some capacity, some expertise in the country to be less dependent. You'd spend extra resources just in case, just to be safe. But it's never a rational end in itself.
As someone with a bunch of friends who had factory gigs before NAFTA and still a few today, there’s plenty of people who are happy in factory situations, you know?
It’s fair to say there’s a lot of inaccurate assumptions on the right wing side here, but factory work isn’t always a horror show. It’s obvious they want to do as much as they can to make it awful, like deregulating things and whatnot. And obviously, the infrastructure isn’t there and won’t spring up overnight. That’s no good, but the factory labor itself? Probably fine in a lot of cases.
load more comments
(1 replies)
You could also think that the country would be better off with people working manufacturing instead of gig jobs like Uber or minimum wage at restaurants since manufacturing in the US typically meant unions and better pay.
Not in modern day USA. I mean there are people working to re-legalise child labour.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That 25% may not know that most US manufacturing is outsourced to nations with a lower valued currency, lax health and safety regulations, child labor, and/or slave labor. It’s probably still a cushy upgrade for coal miners.
Assuming the 80% could be satisfied...is a big assumption.
True enough, though I meant it more in the sense of the graph. People can rarely be satisfied.