this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
104 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

45852 readers
409 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
104
Nextcloud (PHP) vs OpenCloud (Go) (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As Nextcloud advanced with progresses making it competitive in fully integrated government and corporate workflows, OpenCloud is getting more and more attention.

The fact, that both are collaborative cloud plattforms, designed to be selfhosted and mainly developed in/around Berlin from FOSS-Community-Surroundings, makes one ask about the differences.

The main difference I see, is the software stack

  • Nextcloud, as a fork of ownCloud, kept the PHP code base and is still mainly developing in PHP
  • OpenCloud, also a fork of ownCloud, did a complete rewrite in Go

Until know, Nextcloud is far more feature complete (yes I know, people complain, they should fix more bugs instead of bringing new features) than OpenCloud, if we compair it with comercial cometitors like MS Teams.

I like Nextcloud!

I deploy it for various groups, teams, associations, when ever they need something where they want to have fileshare, calendar, contacts and tasks in one place. Almost every time, when I show them the functionality of Nextcloud Groups an the sharing-possibilities, people are thrilled about it, because they didn't expect such a feature rich tool. Although I sometimes wish it would be more performant and easier to maintain, so non-tech-people could care for their hosting themselves.

Why OpenCloud?

Now, with OpenCloud, I am asking my self, why not just contribute to the existing colab-cloud project Nextcloud. Why do your own thing?

Questions

So here I expect the Go as a somewhat game-changer (?). As you may have noticed, that I am not a developer or programmer, so maybe there are obvious advantages of that.

  • Will OpenCloud, at some point, outreach Nextclouds feature completeness and performance, thanks to a more modern approach with Go?
  • Will Nextcloud with their huge php stack run into problems in the future, because they cant compete with more modern architectures?
  • If you would have to deploy a selfhosted cloud environment for a ~500 people organization lasting long term: Would you stick to the goo old working php stack or see possible advantages in the future of the OpenCloud approach?

Thanks :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Question for the OP or anyone who uses OpenCloud: How does it size up in an enterprise? NextCloud has known capacity for corporate use with SSO, a desktop app, integrations...but it has all the pitfalls of PHP (granted I run it with Nginx/FastCGI and a lot of resources). The thing is, anything not PHP can be run for less overhead in terms of actual cloud costs, so I see a benefit to OpenCloud. But the features have to be there. I know a desktop app is coming soon, and thats just one of many needs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

+1 that question, I've also never installed/used OpenCloud, simply because I didn't see the benefit of it until now.

Based on the comments given so far, I have some hope that over time, the Go-approach could give us a more resource saving, but feature full alternative to tangle with, so I will stay tuned :)

For now I will stick to Nextcloud, because it gives me all the features I need and the maintanance, at least for the couple-hundred-user-instances I maintain, is not that bad, as I often read around the web :) But I also can understand, that people wish to have less maintenance struggles and therefor try sth else, wich is good for me, so I can hope for more experience reports in the near future :p

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Deployment of NC on kubernetes/docker (and maintenance thereof) is super scary. They copy config files around in dockerfile, e.g., it's a hell of a mess. (And not just docker: I have one instance running on an old-fashioned webhosting with only ftp access and I have to manually edit .ini and apache config after each update since they're being overwritten.) As the documentation of OCIS is growing and it gets more features, I might actually change even the larger instances, but for now I must consider it as not feature complete (since people have expectations from nextcloud that aren't met by ocis and its extensions). Moreover, I have more trust in the long term openness of nextcloud as opposed to owncloud, for historical reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Evaluation of the product no longer required.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tried OCIS a while back and its way faster than NC syncing files, even the initial sync was so fast I didn't trust it was fully done (but it was).

That being said, OCIS is missing several key features I daily use: namely proper DAV support (contacts, calendar, todo, journal, etc) as well as integrations for stuff like SeedVault for mobile backups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I only use nextdoor for the file storage. Like Dropbox type of thing. Too get files to different computers when I need them. I don't use any other feature.

Should I switch to opencloud?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That's basically my use-case as well, and it's why I'm currently switching to OCIS/OpenCloud. And OCIS (and probably OpenCloud) recently introduced the POSIX driver, so the main complaint about files not being accessible w/o some extra tool is no longer an issue. I'm planning to hard-link the data directories elsewhere to make interacting with it a bit easier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Have you tried Synching? If you only need transferring files back and forth and no version control or snapshot-like backups, that might be even simpler

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I do want the browser interface image I can't sweep syncthing, like on a work computer, public computer, fault friends whatever.

I think that was my 1 hang up for syncthing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Syncthing also even has basic version control, just no "web file browsing" interface.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So really your only reason for possibly not liking next cloud is that it's PHP, correct?

What is the problem with PHP? I keep asking it and until now every response has been near me worthy. "Don't like PHP because some function calls are not consistent.", "don't like PHP because 20 years ago it had Manu unsafe practices!", that sort of nonsense.

What is the problem with PHP, for you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

PHP apps always feel old.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I'm not OP, but here are my reasons:

  • needs a webserver to be configured properly, in addition to the application itself - most other projects handle the server itself, so I can simply reverse proxy to it
  • recent security audit found a variety of vulnerabilities - PHP has been known to have a lot of security vulnerabilities, and it's commonly targeted due to popularity and the prevalence of these vulnerabilities; using literally anything else reduces the likelihood that you'll be targeted by script kiddies
  • since it doesn't run an active server, things like WebSockets are wonky - AFAICT, Nextcloud solves this by using a separate Rust binary, which is weird
  • using the templating feature (i.e. the whole point of PHP) takes a lot of resources vs client-side rendering, so the main sell of PHP is architecturally suspect
  • I don't use it, so if I needed to fix a bug, it would be a lot of work; I'm a lot more familiar with other languages, like Go, Rust, and Python

There are a bunch of other reasons I strongly dislike PHP, but hopefully this is enough to show why I generally prefer to avoid it. In fact, Nextcloud is my only PHP-based app, and I'm testing out OCIS now (will probably try OpenCloud soon).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not the biggest fan of Nextcloud but there currently isn't a lot of good alternatives that have the same features and polish.

The issue with Nextcloud is the PHP junk it comes with. Writing something in Go is much better and it is silly to me that Nextcloud puts code in docker volumes. If they could separate out the code and data they would be in a much better position.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

PHP junk

So serious question: what,.in your mind, is junk about PHP?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is not really a proper language. It is designed to run to generate HTML dynamically but uses outside of that are pushing it. It is also problematic that Nextcloud mixes code and data. It is also slower than compiled languages like C, Go or Rust.

I think Go is really good for web applications with lots of server back end code since it is fast and static while being memory safe and easy to read. The Go syntax is cleaner than PHP and less hard to maintain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I have a bunch of other reasons elsewhere in this thread, but I just wanted to back you up here. Go is a lot easier to deal with than PHP in many ways, and it has a lot of tools to track down issues, while also have a lot better performance. And I don't even like Go that much (used it for the better part of a decade, pretty much since 1.0), and I much prefer Rust. But Go is 100% a good option for this use-case, since it's mostly short-lived requests with relatively simple logic, so the various footguns I dislike about Go aren't particularly relevant (and are way nicer than the footguns in PHP).

PHP feels like it "evolved" with hacks on top of hacks, and it's sort of being cleaned up now. Go feels like it was "designed," with conscious choices being made from the outset, so everything feels a lot more consistent. That makes it easier to spot bogs, performance issues, etc. Go is just the better option here, and it's not close.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While I dont see OpenCloud replacing Nextcloud anytime soon, I always welcome new projects, especially like this to the open source community!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think it's trying to. If you need the features Nextcloud provides, you should use Nextcloud. However, if your needs are a bit more modest and you mostly just need something that stores and retrieves files, then OpenCloud/ownCloud OCIS is probably the better bet. It's a lot faster, scales a lot better, and it's recent, so it doesn't have all he baggage Nextcloud does.

My use case is very simple, I just want to store, retrieve, and edit files. So I just need to figure out Collabora or OnlyOffice integration, which should be pretty similar to how Nextcloud does it. If I end up needing the other features NextCloud offers, I'll either switch (unlikely) or find projects that provide those features (e.g. things exist for calendar, weather, etc).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why use OpenCloud instead of ownCloud Infinite Scale, which it was forked from? What's the value proposition?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Supposedly the team left OwnCloud and forked it. So the value is that the OCIS team will be working on OpenCloud in the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Wow. Here's an article that discusses it:

After the takeover, the management style changed, former ownCloud employees told heise online in confidence. And there was a lack of concrete commitments from Kiteworks regarding the long-term development of oCIS. They had worked on oCIS out of conviction, believed in its future as an open source product and also valued the joint team. For this reason, the decision was made to gradually make a new start with OpenCloud, according to several employees.

...

This is now the second time that the ownCloud code has been forked: In spring 2016, co-founder Frank Karlitschek left the company together with a dozen developers and founded Nextcloud. There, they further developed the PHP code and incorporated many additional functions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

NextCloud being so slow forced me to migrate to Seafile.

Seafile being less one-stop-shoppy made me not use it so much, but whenever I do it is always fast and responsive (unlike nextcloud, where 80% of the time I was looking at the loading indicator). Looking it up now though, it looks like it has a lot of new features I haven't yet tried so I'm probably gonna start using it more now.

Only downside with Seafile is it's deduplication (for me), because it stops me from easily accessing files directly (always gotta use a client). Likely a benefit for most though and I do rarely need to access a file directly on disk, just when I do, it'd be an easy shortcut for whatever I'm doing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Check out the POSIX driver in OCIS/OpenCloud. It should keep the responsiveness of Seafile, while having a sane disk format.

Or you can try out the Seafile FUSE layer.

I'm in a similar boat, and I've been testing out Seafile and ownCloud OCIS, and I think I prefer OCIS. I'll probably switch to OpenCloud though, since it seems a lot of the OCIS devs went there due to issues w/ management.

Some things I didn't like about Seafile:

  • complicated to set up - I wanted to throw it in a container, and that made it a lot more complex
  • weird codebase - a lot of it's in C, and some is in Go - not sure if they're switching to Go eventually, or if it's a one-off thing
  • they only support MariaDB/MySQL, and I really want to avoid that - OCIS lets me just use the filesystem, which is really nice

But hey, if it works, it works, so don't mess w/ it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for your reply, I will definitely keep that in mind if Seafile fails to meet any critera moving on, but yeah your last point is also right, it would probably be a big pain to migrate out at this point with all my data for multiple users here.

It seems a lot has been modernising recently, I didn't know they were also using Go, but hopefully they continue with it for new code.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

i keep having issues and bugs on nextcloud. maybe i should try opencloud

load more comments
view more: next ›