this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
246 points (89.9% liked)

World News

45721 readers
2196 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Backs down for a few days Also I'm mad that Tesla is up at 272 now from 221 earlier this morning

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

As if anyone is going to start buying Elon's crap cars again just because Trump suspends some tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Soar" is a strong word when you consider they were higher less than a week ago. Can't wait for the next thing he says to drop the market before the weekend so his boys can get in on the next pump and dump. He literally tweeted "NOW IS A GOOD TIME TO BUY" right before he paused the tariffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

This is kind of funny tbh

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Are we sure this wasn't a pump and dumb scheme by the administration?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

It is a dump scheme. Only

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump literally said "it's a great time to buy".

So, yes, it is definitely a pump and dump, but it's not only a pump and dump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Oh boy all this uncertainty is surely good for their precious economy.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

Isn't the 10% still active? This is the oldest negotiation strategy in the book..

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The market reaction is dumb. 90 days bus very little for companies to adapt when years are needed.

I think this but it's just the people seeing his tweet immediately before he lifted the restrictions.

Looks like we are still heading for recession and Treasury bills interest is still jumping up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think this but it's just the people seeing his tweet immediately before he lifted the restrictions.

Market doesn't know if the tariffs are even coming back, and are taking the chance to buy back low.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He suspended it for 90 days and also previously threatened that there will be more, so we don't even know if next week there won't be new tariffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I agree this is just market euphoria. We have a lot of systemic issues that have been exacerbated and/or entirely created by Trump.

The core problem is Trump full stop. He is sitting in the White House with nothing but “Yes” men in his cabinet. It’s only a mater of time until he releases his next scheme on the market.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

One part is a reverse game of chicken, buy the dippest dip to realize most profit from less dippy dip buyers.

The other part is the assumption that this means the tariffs will never actually come or at least in a much relaxed form.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

The vibe I get is that most elites really don't want to believe the president could be dumb, because that means they could be too. Elites own and/or work with a lot of stocks, and that extends to their investing decisions.

So they figure, sure, it must just be a 4D chess bluff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And you really think "the elites" are the ones buying and selling here?

Yes, they have a lot of wealth in stocks, but usually they simply own a large chunk of their (or their parents) company and the rest is managed by a fund manager. And if you have millions or billions, you don't need to think quarter to quarter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wealth is a continuum; there's no actual dividing line, like is commonly thought. But just personally, the posher people I know are less bearish, and it looks like the trend continues once you get even higher. Big fund managers tend to be in the picture. I don't know off the top of my head how much movement is professionals and how much is retail investors.

I feel the need to disclose that I'm personally short on the US, relative to other markets.

Edit: And I should also mention the myth of meritocracy has a wide following, it's just extra favoured by the people who would be implied to have merit by it. And there's the fact that most people came up in a time where this sort of thing never happened, so there's normalcy bias on top of it all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and the rest is managed by a fund manager.

This is one area I'm ignorant on that I wish I knew more. How are these daytraders or fund managers avoiding capital gains taxes? When they are liquidating a position as they are selling securities, they are trying to preserve prior gains. At best aren't they getting hit with 15% capital gains taxes on the sale? If so, the fund manager has to believe they will lose more than 15% to justify the transaction right? Again this is best case assuming they've held the security for more than a year. Short term capital gains taxes can be as high as 37%!

I understand folks making these vast swinging trades in their IRA or 401k where they are immune to capital gains, but how are fund managers (or regular retail after tax investors) making these wild swings without being eaten alive by taxes?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You are taxed on the gains, not on the total sale volume.

So if I buy something today for $5, and sell it tomorrow for $6, I pay the 37% on the $1 of gain.

So my takeaway is $5.63, not the $3.78 it would be I was taxed on the full sale.

It's also worth noting that capital losses can offset gains. So if I made $1000 on one trade, but lost $1000 on another, my effective tax is $0, because I didn't make any money.

This can get squishy though, as there are a lot of accounting loopholes you can do to count things as "losses" that are more losses on paper than actual losses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You are taxed on the gains, not on the total sale volume.

You're right, of course, I didn't write that well. I'm in for the long term and don't usually think about the smaller gains usually in short term. For me, even just the long term gains are substantial with the 45%-ish increases in value in the last couple of years prior to trump.

It’s also worth noting that capital losses can offset gains. So if I made $1000 on one trade, but lost $1000 on another, my effective tax is $0, because I didn’t make any money.

I knew this part too, but if a hedge fund/daytrader is doing this enough that their capital losses offset their gains, then they would be a pretty worthless hedge fund manager/daytrader, right?

This can get squishy though, as there are a lot of accounting loopholes you can do to count things as “losses” that are more losses on paper than actual losses.

This is the part I'm ignorant about, I think.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Is there anything that Trump can't do?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Make rational decisions relating to trade.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Lots. Math, logic, leading a nation, golf, speak, charm, stay on the good side of the law, make friends...can't be bothered to continue..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thos whole thing is so fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Like the majority of muricans

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

as a 'merican... i feel that

but also I'm Lakota and I'm fucking laughing

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago

For 90 days, if he can resist changing it again that long.

I'm also pretty confused about how Canada and Mexico fit into this, because they said we're included in the rollback to 10%, but we weren't in the original "liberation day" tariffs in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

35% Tarriffs on eu/Asia and 104% Tarriffs on China is still a recession. Other countries arent removing their Tarriffs

The only positive thing this did was show that Trump is weak, so hopefully he'll stay at these rates and maybe he'll be out by the end of the year

[–] [email protected] 205 points 5 days ago (5 children)

"Soar"

Looks back a month to compare

Falling without style?

[–] [email protected] 92 points 5 days ago

First thing I thought. Even after today, the S&P 500 is down 5% on the month and 10% since Trump took office

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I guess y'all think 90 days is enough time for China to back down and for all of your manufacturing and supply chain to spin up?

He could change his mind on a fart tomorrow.

Farce.

Can’t wait to see the demands for DEI removal from sovereign nations to avoid tariffs. Or more energy blackmail.

🖕

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if the US moron brigade demands from African nations that they shouldn't hire black people anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 5 days ago

Penguins 1 - USA 0

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›