this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
1107 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68867 readers
4708 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't be so negative. By 2035, a 2500 dollar us made iPhone might be possible.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because of the child laborers making 85 cents an hour?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That would make building a $2500 iPhone in the US even more difficult.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but by 2035 the US dollar will be worth about 8 pence. If they're lucky.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it is. They want 1500 bucks for something with a few hundred dollars of overhead. R and d not withstanding they'll want the same amount of profit for the phone if it's made in America and profits have to increase year after year! They can't make a little less profit they have to make more than before!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (8 children)

it's not just acost the issue, there's not enough skilled people to actually build them.

Industrial engineers, people that would be willing to assemble devices would be in short supply

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As someone who has done a bunch of phone repairs with the help of YouTube, assembly isn't that hard. If they don't want to assemble them here, it's completely about profit margins. We should be taking steps to reduce that profit margin. Tax the rich and all that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump "saving" America from anything is pure fantasy true, and yet he got elected - TWICE. The fantasy of idiocracy is reality. Make people desperate enough for work by gutting minimum wage, Medicare, and everything else MAGA plans to do to create a feudal system, and the US becomes a cheap labor source to sell US-made iPhones and all kinds of other shit abroad. Either get used to that reality or figure out what to do about it.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just because you can make phones with an army of cheap Chinese labour doesn't mean that's the only or best way. With suitable "design for manufacture", pick and place robots like those used in PCB design could relatively easily be adopted to screw screws in where needed. Use plugs instead of those flat cable things, then the whole lot could be easily automated. Remove any aspect of the design that needs fingers and the whole process can be automated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Wow what a great idea, I wonder why nobody else has ever thought about it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

If that were possible they would have already done that, since it's cheaper to fully automate everything in the long run than to have humans involved in any part of the manufacturing process. No matter how cheap you get the labor automation will still beat it out, unless they are literal slaves, and even then the quality of work probably won't be as good as an automated system, so it still might not be economically sensible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

In the meantime, the Liberty phone seems to be the closest option for a US-made smartphone. While not entirely comprised of US-sourced components, the PCBs are manufactured in California, as well as device packaging and assembly.

April 10 update: Right on time, the author of the OP's linked article has now published an article on the Liberty phone.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Decade old specs for decade in the future price.

I have not looked beyond the front page of the link you shared here, and I don't mean my criticism to be more than tongue in cheek, but oh boy, $2k for that is.... Something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was article written by their former marketing director or something stating that the CPU, GPU and stuff are still sourced from China, and other places as well. They hide it from you. So like it's an eye-watering price for old specs and doesn't really deliver what it says it does.

Found the link: https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4305815/why-i-wont-be-buying-purisms-librem-liberty-smartphone-even-though-i-love-the-idea

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Obviously the CPU and GPU are made in China. You'd have to be an idiot to believe they were made in the US.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fact they made it possible is impressive in itself. Sure it's not competitive for the latest games or such, but society is more and more reliant on smartphones, so having a local option is valuable in itself.

It's a bit like countries making their own planes instead of buying the F-35, which is better and cheaper. They looked stupid at the time, until Trump came back and it turned out strategic autonomy had value.

As for the price, probably it is due to small production ; but also simply underlines how we got used to not paying the "true" price of things, by moving production to places with cheaper costs & labor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Plus, AFAIK, Purism is one of the few companies that pays their developers to write FOSS code, which produced the Phosh UI, basic call and text apps, and mobile-friendly UI library.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

That last part for sure resonates. I can't remember if I said it here or elsewhere, but our prices have been subsidized by substandard working conditions in China, there is no way around it. And all because large corporations wanted to make more money. And we, as consumers, shouted a resounded "hell yeah" to those Chinese suicides at Foxcon, because we wanted cheaper components and cheaper phones.

And so I basically don't know how I feel about anything. I try to be more cognizant about what I buy, where it's from, how it's made, but the speed and ease, and basically not having to think, sometimes trumps those thoughts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

5-10h battery life. Their goal list includes 20h idle time and recording video. It seems to be using some nonstandard SIM and only has GNSS, not GPS. Which is probably fine functionally but apparently they weren't able to source a GPS chip to use the US system that met whatever their standards are? Large list of negatives for something the price of a shiny new foldable, or several non-foldable smartphones.

They also seem to be doing the usual dance of "Made in USA!!!!*"

* what you think of when you think "electronic components" sourced from Asian countries, mostly we're talking about assembly and that this is where it's put in the consumer packaging.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By "nonstandard SIM" do you mean one of two common SIM sizes that are not "nano", which is preferred by current phones?

GNSS means it's global. Which includes US GPS, as well as Europe's Galileo, Russia's GLONASS, and China's BeiDou. Wikipedia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Fair, apparently at some point I conflated GNSS and Galileo.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›