this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
852 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

68725 readers
3707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that "experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public" and "far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years" (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that "they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life." They're much more likely (51 percent) to say they're more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

New technologies are not the issue. The problem is billionaires will fuck it up because they can't control their insatiable fucking greed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I use it at work side-by-side with searches for debugging app issues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It should. We should have radically different lives today because of technology. But greed keeps us in the shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

remember when tech companies did fun events with actual interesting things instead of spending three hours on some new stupid ai feature?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem could be that, with all the advancements in technology just since 1970, all the medical advancements, all the added efficiencies at home and in the workplace, the immediate knowledge-availability of the internet, all the modern conveniences, and the ability to maintain distant relationships through social media, most of our lives haven't really improved.

We are more rushed and harried than ever, life expectancy (in the US) has decreased, we've gone from 1 working adult in most families to 2 working adults (with more than 1 job each), income has gone down. Recreation has moved from wholesome outdoor activities to an obese population glued to various screens and gaming systems.

The "promise of the future" through technological advancement, has been a pretty big letdown. What's AI going to bring? More loss of meaningful work? When will technology bring fewer working hours and more income - at the same time? When will technology solve hunger, famine, homelessness, mental health issues, and when will it start cleaning my freaking house and making me dinner?

When all the jobs are gone, how beneficial will our overlords be, when it comes to universal basic income? Most of the time, it seems that more bad comes from out advancements than good. It's not that the advancements aren't good, it's that they're immediately turned to wartime use considerations and profiteering for a very few.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I see it lowering people's ability to focus and for analytical/critical thinking.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree. Albeit there are some advantages, of course, I am 100% certain that in the aggregate, it will make people more stupid and gullible.

It is sort of obvious when you engage with the thought, and seek it to its natural conclusion:

https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/using-ai-reduces-your-critical-thinking-skills-microsoft-study-warns

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

How did they answer the question about rock and roll being a fad?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Most people in the early 90’s didn’t have or think they needed a computer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

80's. 80's we had apple iis, commodores, tandys, ibm pcs, etc. 90's it was cell phones

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How did those barbarians sit on the toilet without memes to scroll?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I need someone to bitch at anonymously too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That was the job of reader's digest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And if you're desperate, the back of a shampoo bottle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I thought Reader's Digest was for when the roll ran out.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Its just going to help industry provide inferior services and make more profit. Like AI doctors.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

They're right. What happens to the workers when they're no longer required? The horses faced a similar issue at the advent of the combustion engine. The solution? Considerably fewer horses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But as for the people who worked with horses, I'm pretty sure they found different jobs - it's not like they were sent to a glue factory.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course, they learned to code.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

New cascadeur update just killed inbetweenjng jobs if its as good as the trailer, but uh I think this is a case where ai good, like yeah jobs lost but the time saved is wild for indie animators

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dont believe AI will ever be more than essentially a parlar trick that fools you into thinking it's intelligent when it's really just a more advanced tool like excel compared to pen and paper or an abacus.

The real threat will be people who fool themselves into thinking it's more than that and that it's word is law, like a diety. Or worse, the people that do understand that but like various religious and political leaders that used religion to manipulate people, the new AI Pope's will try and do the same manipulation but with AI.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

"I dont believe AI will ever be more than essentially a parlar trick that fools you into thinking it's intelligent."

So in other words, it will achieve human-level intellect.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

https://www.sesame.com/research/crossing_the_uncanny_valley_of_voice#demo

Try this voice AI demo on your phone, then imagine if it can create images and video.

This in my opinion changes every system of information gathering that we have, and will usher in an era of geniuses, who grew up with access to the answer to their every question in a granular pictorial video response. If you want to for example learn how white blood cells work it gives you ask your chatbot for a video, and you can then tell it to put in different types of bacteria to see the response. Its going to make a lot of systems we have now obsolete.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you can't learn from chatbots though. how can you trust that the material is accurate? any time I've asked a chatbot about subject matter that I'm well versed in, they make massive mistakes.

All you're proving is "we can learn badly faster!" or worse, we can spread misinformation faster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

This presume trust in its accuracy.

A very high bar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This is another level, thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Removing the need to do any research is just removing another exercise for the brain. Perfectly crafted AI educational videos might be closer to mental junk food than anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Same was said about calculators.

I don't disagree though. Calculators are pretty discrete and the functions well defined.

Assuming AI can be trusted to be accurate at some point, your will reduce cognitive load that can be utilized for even higher thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Holy shit, that AI chat is too good.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›