this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1346 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

70248 readers
4047 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

On the one hand, less censorship, on the other, something a lot worse.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

They don’t want proof that what’s going to be happening soon, was ever mortally objectionable.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren't so damn overdue. They don't even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Google search feels like it has stopped being the magic it was. Now whenever I search for something I might not find it underneath all the stuff on sale. For the first time in I don't know how many years I've been finding myself using something else like Duck Duck Go.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's okay. I gotcha so you don't got to ssy it

Spicehoarder told y'all so!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

~~Don’t~~ be evil

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Google should get destroyed

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it's time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Pichai kissed the ring. He's colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.

All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I'm at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that's me.

I'd be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if Tim Cook is there too. It would make sense for him and Apple to resist this at least somehow but...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

Look who's laughing now.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good lord, the amount of idiots that white knighted me for using uBlock.

"WOULD U WORK FOR FREEEEE????!!?"

Like fuck off no I wouldn't. I also dont buy up every other company I see, turn it to shit and then try to force a political agenda through it, and guess who IS doing that using billions of dollars? Yep, Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Those aren't opinions I would care about in the first place. Somebody thinks you should be watching ads? WTF?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There's some justification for this idea since the people who buy the products advertised by ads are the source of the money that goes to the producers of the videos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Please think about billionaires!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

but google's profits!!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That is why centralized platforms, especially powerful ones, are sitting ducks waiting to become even more corrupt. Why more people are not leaving centralized services is a crime against humanity as it is clear that supporting theme means society suffers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's frightening. Why do people not make an effort to leave Reddit?

How can the same people run a dictatorship of the proletariat? Even democracy, I don't see how society as a whole can avoid being manipulated.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The 'not leaving centralized services' thing isn't really helped when there's basically no other viable alternatives, like is the case with YT. PeerTube exists, sure, but it's a content desert, sadly.

Now, if PeerTube had more content to choose from.....

Really though, Reddit, Meta, Twitter, and Discord all have viable decentralized alternatives in the form of Lemmy, Pixelfed, Mastodon (Mastodon serving as an alternative for both Facebook and Twitter), and Matrix respectively, why can't PeerTube serve as a truly viable decentralized alternative for YT?

Even Linux is in its glow-up arc as a viable Windows alternative lately ffs, and I'm glad to have been on that bandwagon for years before that platform started gaining mainstream attention.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›