this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
811 points (98.0% liked)

World News

45374 readers
2492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Germany's military, the Bundeswehr, recently got the all-clear for a massive increase in investment after parliament voted to exempt defence spending from strict rules on debt.

The country's top general has told the BBC the cash boost is urgently needed because he believes Russian aggression won't stop at Ukraine.

"We are threatened by Russia. We are threatened by Putin. We have to do whatever is needed to deter that," Gen Carsten Breuer says. He warns that Nato should be braced for a possible attack in as little as four years.

"It's not about how much time I need, it's much more about how much time Putin gives us to be prepared," the defence chief says bluntly. "And the sooner we are prepared the better."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Germant repeats history. More news at 11.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

I foresee a non-zero chance that this could backfire and their new ever-expanding military budget gets used on smaller weaker nations and then as an excuse to divert funding away from services that people actually rely on.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

What choice do we have? I would focus on improving everything for the regulars and copy the Finnish reserve system.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Misleading title ass click bait type shit.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Great powers rearming will not be good for anyone no matter what the context is around it. After Napoleon, European leaders were so afraid of war between great powers that they avoided it for 100 years. The moment they let their guard up we got WW1. The weapons do not make us safer. Don't think for a moment it can't happen again.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

After Napoleon, European leaders were so afraid of war between great powers that they avoided it for 100 years.

What kind of bullshit is this? The napoleonic wars were over in 1815. In 1866 there war the austro-prussian war, in 1870 the franco-german war. That's barely 50 years, and those wars are just those I remember from history class. I'm sure there were more in between. Or are we talking Napoleon III who was deposed in the franco-german war in 1870? Well I'm pretty sure in the 100 years since then Napoleon there were some even bigger wars.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Neither does passivism though. If everyone around you is losing your mind, you either give up your freedom and very possibly your life, or you fight.

The only reason no other great power has needed a fully prepared military is because of US leadership. That can't be trusted now, so here we are.

[–] TylerBourbon@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't see this as Germany leaving history in the past, but being smart to protect their future so the that the lessons of the past mean something.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Germans are on track to elect the AfD. Do you think them having a 500 Billion dollar army is a good plan?

load more comments