this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
48 points (94.4% liked)

Europe

5046 readers
2118 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
48
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

USA is no longer wanting to appear reasonable. It has forever said goodbye to being the world police with limited liability. Instead it's now only after its own simple selfish gains. And it won't face other predators but instead work with them if deemed worth it.

The biggest threat to Europe is no longer Russia or china. The most immediate threat to European soil is by the us in Greenland.

I don't think that trump and Vance are going to stop short of what they announced. They will go for Greenland.

This time the roles are reversed. It's no longer the US saving Europe as in the World wars.

This time it might go all the way around that the US also invade Canada and that Europa has to find it's position to bringing them to their senses.

At the end of the day this means that borders become increasingly uncertain.

The question is what policy will prevail. Predator logic or community based on the protection of minority rights.

Btw. I favor the later but I'm also not a fan of the strict division of nations by borders.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US annexing Canada and China invading Alaska is the scenario from Fallout. But the timeline has moved by ~50 years...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Isn't it lore that the middle east are gone years before Alaska is invaded?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your take is quite reasonable, but can we please collectively stop regurgitating this "the US saved Europe in WW1/WW2" nonsense? It's crazy how much they influenced our perception of history to the point where some of us genuinely believe they were our saviours.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I understand that tensions are high right now and that we're angry at how we're being treated, but I don't agree with your statement.

The US contributed massively towards ending both wars. If the US didn't intervene in WW1, the war would have dragged on even further which would have caused additional casualties and destruction to an already exhausted continent. The Americans saved a lot of lives and Wilson's 14 points were the foundation for European democracy for years afterwards. Many nations would not have been able to establish their own states in Europe otherwise.

In WW2, while it wasn't the primary reason the Third Reich fell (that would be the Soviets), the US was in large part responsible for liberating most of Western Europe from German occupation. Additionally, American post war monetary aid allowed Europe to rebuild at a faster pace and their security guarantees maintained peace on the continent throughout the Cold War.

I think it's important to differentiate between the US right now and the US back then. We're talking about two different societies here. Let's not mix in the Americans that fought and died for our freedom with Trump and his cronies.

Edit: fixed some grammar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

US of the past is the only nation to ever nuke an adversary. It wasn't necessary either. It was a show of force that could have been as effective if detonated at sea.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right, but all of that doesn't equate to the US "saving" Europe. We should be grateful for every single nation that contributed to ending the suffering in Europe at the time, so I find it a bit disingenuous to only name the US when we talk about these events.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We should be grateful for every single nation that contributed to ending the suffering in Europe at the time, so I find it a bit disingenuous to only name the US when we talk about these events.

I fully agree with this statement, just not the manner in which you express yourself when referring to these events. A lot of people would view your initial comment as being hateful over your interpretation of the word "saved". I have no problem saying the Americans saved us. Just like I have no problems saying the Canadians saved us, or the Australians or all the other non European nations that took part in the World Wars on the side of the Entente/Allies. The people that fought chose to leave their countries and risk their lives for us. I think it's disrespectful towards their memory to be bickering over this just because of a nepo baby that's causing us headaches right now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

There is a significant portion of the US that supports all this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I imagine it’ll kick off at once. Canada will defend Greenland as if it were our own.