this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
251 points (93.4% liked)

World News

45374 readers
3010 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

JD Vance criticized Denmark for failing to protect Greenland from Russian and Chinese incursions during a visit to the U.S. military base in Pituffik.

While pledging respect for Greenland's sovereignty, Vance announced increased U.S. naval presence without expanding ground forces.

Trump echoed the need for Greenland’s strategic importance to global security.

Greenland’s new prime minister condemned the visit as disrespectful, and public protests opposed U.S. influence. Trump’s administration continues to push for stronger U.S. involvement in the mineral-rich Arctic region.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Vance says whatever he's told to say.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

And his traitorous wife

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the problem with the fascists’ imperialist ideas of conquest is that they are all based on kernels of truth, it’s how they appeal to their base.

attack them there, not in the space of rational discourse in which they are advantaged. they hold no respect for reality or the truth.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Could you elaborate with regards to this specific example?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

sure.

greenland is historically and definitely a part of denmark. then again, the sudetenland was definitely a part of bohemia/czechia.

the united states is in a position to undertake an imperial conquest. i won’t claim any veracity for how long they might be able to hold on to any gains made, but they can make gains. i see a lot of people who live in places that are in the warpath of the trump party wanting to reject this idea online, sometimes out of ignorance, sometimes out of pride, sometimes for other reasons. the fact of the matter is that what the neofascist movement has been able to wrestle control of is the single largest, deadliest, and most effective military in the history of the earth. this isn’t american nationalism, it’s a rational analysis of the situation. most strategic flukes (eg, withdrawal from afghanistan) in america’s recent history have nothing to do with the military’s intrinsic capabilities; it has everything to do with american inexperience in the practice of imperialism. the military itself is actually like, incredibly fucking competent

the only other power on earth of any similar degree is china. china has essentially engaged in a neocolonial economic conquest of africa over the course of the 21st century, reasserting historical norms of chinese preeminence over global affairs. do you really think they will be any better than the americans? no. they seek blood and iron as well.

europe is not in a position to defend itself from america right now. i hope europeans realize this and vote in their own best interest to readily establish a pan european army as soon as possible. i know this is a controversial subject over there. but, this is the reality we live in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Russia is a threat to Greenland = true

Leaving Denmark weakens Greenland’s security though

So the idea that leaving would make them more secure is false

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Who exactly is the intended audience?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Same as it ever is. Their Russian handlers and their mouth breathing, Nazi loving supporters.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 days ago (4 children)

what in the fuck leads him believe that Greenland is in danger?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Also, why do they get to talk like that when they're threatening their owm neighbours and former allies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

It's a racket, a stick up job. "Nice country you've got, it would be a shame if anything happened to it. We can help you keep it safe, for a price."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The only country threatening Greenland is his country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yes. That's the very definition of a protection racket.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

IDK man. they seemed to keep the Russian assets out from their recent publicity tour.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 days ago

The US made agreement with Denmark to do this in 1951. Instead, the US has gone from 10000 personel to 200 and closed the majority of their bases. From 17 to 1 base.

This is Danish foreign minister on the subject after it being clear that JD Vance has no idea what he's talking about

https://x.com/larsloekke/status/1905764027210547565

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Russia can't even easily annex confining countries with lots of roads and rails, how they would even try to get to Greenland with all those NATO countries in the middle.

China would even need to circumnavigate the Americas to reach it

I feel there's another dictatorship that's more dangerous than those two

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In the middle? Have you ever seen a globe? They would go across the Arctic.

That's why there are American airbases and NATO radar stations up there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

But then you need to buy into the conspiracy theory that the earth is round

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They paid almost 3 percent and now are upping it TO 3 percent of their total gdp on defense. They are in line with it.

Vance and trump are so ego based and dumb af.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Denmark 0.97 1.09 2.16 1.95 1.49 1.85 1.84 4.08 3.07 2.64 2.29 (2014-2024estimated)
Source: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/6/pdf/240617-def-exp-2024-en.pdf

Considering that the "old" benchmark was 2%... They didn't even make that number for years. Only stepping up and consistently paying when Russia actually started their invasion. And even then they are rapidly regressing back to the 2% number.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

I was wondering about the average so I came back, turns out it's over 2 percent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So what your telling me, Is they've been paying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No. I'm telling you that "They paid almost 3 percent" is bullshit. I'm telling you that you're lying. I make no claim for anything else other than you're full of shit. You're making shit up to complain about "orange man" and not looking at what's actually made them pay. Which was Russian aggression.

And no, you can't just take the average when there's a clear pivot point of an event. Someone had to make up the shortfall in the pre-Russian invasion time-frame. That wasn't just free. They were average 1.6% in the 6 years prior to Russian invasion of Ukraine. Well below the benchmark.


But wait! Turns out I copied and pasted the wrong table... I grabbed it from a page down because I was an idiot and scrolled too far!

Here's the real data.. Denmark 1.15 1.11 1.15 1.14 1.28 1.30 1.38 1.30 1.37 2.01 2.37

1.556% as an average... with pre-invasion looking closer to 1.2%

So even now they barely make the benchmark even after Russian invasion (post-invasion averages 1.7%). So not only are you really full of shit, but you're SUPER full of shit. They've never paid anything close to 3%. Let alone actually maintaining their 2%.

Edit: fixed wording to be more clear on post Russian invasion benchmark.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

People in Greenland and Denmark:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can Greenland’s leaders tell our idiots in charge to fuck themselves? Make that an official statement too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

They kinda did; that's why he visited just the base, without his wife.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 days ago

Ah, the Russia playbook. Make up a boogie man and claim you're saving the country from the boogie man. Krasnov is a bit too predictable.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

Journalists need to quit acting as uncritical flying monkeys for the fascists' DARVO tactics.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

Have Russia and China ever threatened Greenland? Because I can only think of one country that actually has.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Looks like they updated the title: "Vance accuses Denmark of not keeping Greenland safe from Russia, China"

But really, journalists don't need to pretend any of this is legitimate. Add a "dubiously" in there. This is obviously not a sincere complaint. Stop assuming good faith just because he's got an official title.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But really, journalists don’t need to pretend any of this is legitimate.

In 2016, I would have agreed with you. I think now, journalists' personal safety might be at risk if they don't fall in line.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of other journalists posting anti Trump content without problem. If you're too scared to use words to mildly criticize power, you shouldn't be a journalist in the first place. They didn't become cowards due to Trump's new hyper fascism, they've been like that the whole time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Kind of a moot point I guess. You're right, they were always cowards.

load more comments
view more: next ›