this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
498 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23015 readers
4175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


The Senate voted Thursday to strike down a rule capping most bank overdraft fees at $5, a measure adopted late last year by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that had been expected to save Americans billions of dollars per year.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, was the lone Republican to oppose the resolution, which passed on a nearly party-line vote, 52-48. It will now move to the House, where Representative French Hill, the Arkansas Republican who leads the Financial Service Committee, introduced a parallel resolution last month.

The rule would have limited the fees banks and credit unions could charge when customers spend more than they have in their accounts, typically $35 per overdraft. The bureau estimated it would save American households $5 billion a year. It was immediately challenged in court by banking trade groups.


Personal opinon:

Call your bank and tell them to turn off overdraft protection now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

This?? THIS is what they spend their time on??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's it. They want to kill us

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is what a GOP congress looks like. If you call yourself a fiscal conservative, I'm tell you what. Go fuck yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Are they still forced to be opt-in, at least?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

lol you can't turn off overdraft protection. I fucking tried. They wouldn't let me do it.

I am not using a major national bank, just a local/regional one from my hometown.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My bank let me! But then turned on some weird "margin" thing where if I overdraft, I just get charged 8% on a "loan"...which...is worse I think...and they didn't tell me. FUN!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I get charged 10.5%. But it's per year and only for the time im in debt. So when I take $1000 more than I have, but pay it back the next say when the salary comes, the Fee will be pennies.

When I'm a year in debt of 1000, it will be a Fee of $105

Not USA though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Same here, I requested it to be turned off and they said no.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I dont think thats legal. They're opt-in. You have to call them to enable it by default, as required by law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Legally you can't be forced to hand over your money, so just tell the armed robber, "no."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You can be forced by violence to hand over your money if you have a contract you signed that stipulates you need to pay them

My point is theaw prevents the default contract from allowing them to setup overdraft protection, unless you explicitly ask for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

My point is, what the law is doesn't matter if the law is not enforced. Good luck fighting a team of lawyers that make more in a minute than you do in a year.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Find yourself a credit union. It will save you hundreds of dollars in fees, and they won''t have bullshit rules like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in my experience the credit unions I am eligible for are no better than commercial banks.

The best credit unions are highly restricted to a small population with a common association. They aren't made for the masses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

This is why those of us with good credit unions need to be helping out those who dont by getting them membership. (I have done this for 3 people so far, and am encouraging others to do it as well. Someone do it for Critical Thinker specifically. no one deserves overdraft fees.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I tried the local credit union, same shit different name.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry to hear that. Had amazing experience with mine - been using them for 20+ years - never paid a penny in fees, and they turned off OD protection for me when I opened the account. They even refund out of network ATM charges, and offer cashback rewards on my debit card.

You might have better luck with another union - there's usually more than one in the area depending on where you're located.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Line up sheeple, the fleecing is in progress

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's important to understand that it is now the philosophy of the Sociopathic Oligarchs and their trans-national corporations, that every person should die penniless, with nothing to pass on to their children.

When people reach middle age, and a bit older, they start to need their health care more, which is tied to their jobs, which are harder to find as you get older. That makes older workers more reliant on those jobs, making them more manipulative, and more accepting of abuse.

The wealthy don't like the fact that many older workers get inhertitances from one side of their marriage or the other, or perhaps both, and then suddenly they have options, and dont need the safety of their company any more. They can afford to find a lower stress job, or start their own (possibly competing) business, or they might just retire.

None of that is good for the wealthy. They want workers who are good little wage slaves, fully dependent on sociopaths to support their families. So now the strategy is to impoverish as many as possible before their deaths, so they have nothing to pass on to their children, to give them easier lives as they age.

So keep the banks fees up, keep property insurance high, keep property taxes high, and most of all make health care wildly expensive, difficult to access, predatory and parasitic. We always hear about most bankruptcies being cause by medical bills, which is frightening to most people, but music to the Sociopathic Oligarchs' ears. Those are people who had money, and lost it all, including their children's inheritance.

Of course the other tendril of the strategy is to kill Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, so people will work literally until their deaths. Retirment is for the wealthy. The rest of us need to keep grinding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

We need a general strike. Everyone needs to just stay home until we start seeing change

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The solution?

Organize. Your. Fucking. Workplace.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly. Unionize EVERYTHING!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep!

Organize your apartment buildings, into tenant unions!

Organize the block you live in.

Together we stand, divided we beg.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Michael Cohen became HitlerPig's "Fixer" because there was a tenant's strike in the HitlerPig-owned building where Cohen lived, and Cohen volunteered to kill the strike from the inside. He succeeded, and HitlerPig hired him.

Beware of snakes in the grass. Nazis always have informants sniffing around.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Of course if we had actual democratic leadership they'd be running ads about everything costing more because of Trump and saying Republicans want them to go deeper in debt paying for groceries when they can't make ends meet.

load more comments
view more: next ›