this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
139 points (82.9% liked)

politics

22749 readers
3020 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Its Lucy and the football for Charlie Brown, and we never learn.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

A.) this is a joke right? B.) amusing they think there’s gonna be a viable election in 2028

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

She needs to fuck off. Permanently.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

I swear to god if they pull this nonsense again…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

To be honest, if there's still an election in 2028 and Kamala Harris is the democrat candidate, I just won't vote anymore. I've voted regularly since I turned 18, but I can't vote Republican in good conscience and Democrats have abandoned the public. I don't even dislike Kamala Harris, she just has no chance of winning and the DNC seems incapable of learning from their mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

Can't wait until she loses again to the same dipshit moron she lost to and we're blamed again for her horrid policy campaign, again.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, things will change in 2032 for sure. You can take that to the bank, jack.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Are you fucking kidding me.

AOC and Bernie over here amassing entire legions of working class people and they're over here bashing themselves in the nuts. doing a straw poll with corporate doners pretending like it means fucking ANYTHING.

GODAMNIT THESE FUCKING DEMOCRATS ARE FUCKING MORONS.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

we are so fucked.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago

Jfc. They'll never learn. We really are all doomed.

Just kidding. We were doomed already.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party’s sole strategy looks like maximizing their big donor and independent votes. So they keep moving toward center-right.

  1. That strategy has failed 2/3 last times so may be try changing it Sherlock.
  2. The big donors don’t care about anything besides their own personal gain. The only difference is that “Democratic” big donors also pretend they care about the people. May be get on the ground and talk to your constituents instead.
  3. Even if you get the independent votes, your main base is completely alienated and does not trust you. So all you will get are the independent votes losing you the election.

This Democratic Party is like the monsters in Scooby Doo - the villain wearing the mask of the common person so they can get closer to you before stabbing in the back.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I became an independent in part to get democrats to actually care about me. They don’t give a fuck what I think if I’m a member because they just assume I’m voting for them.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly I don't think she should run in 28. Nothing against Kamala, but we really don't need a moderate centrist insider to bring us back from the damage Trump is doing. The nation would be far better off having a real debate with Pete, Tim, and Alexandria up on stage. Kamala would have too much power over the process, and would use every bit of it. Which of course means that's exactly what's going to happen, probably handing us a narrow loss to fucking Don Jr. or some other moron puppet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you don't want a moderate why would you want Pete anywhere near?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I want him on the stage, doesn't mean I want him to win. The main problem with Kamala being up there is that she would own the apparatus, the same way Joe and Hillary did. It's a form of censorship that doesn't help the debate, and leads to bad results. It leads to weighting them based on their influence, rather than ability, policy, and character.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also it's going to be a cold day in Hell before a woman wins.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously. This is the thing they do not seem to get. Unfortunately our country is sexist and racist. She will never win.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

All true. But also, a popular woman could win, like AOC. They just keep putting up establishment stooges, that's a large part of the reason why they don't get elected.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Things the DNC has learned:

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was this a poll of the DNC or registered Democrats? Asking because ad blocker.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The poll seems to cover Democrats and "Democrat-leaning independents," so not the DNC.

Exit: can't find the actual post on Morning Consult yet, but the article features an image where they specify the polled population.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If the DNC is stuck on putting up an “establishment” candidate, why not Schiff? Seems like there’s no way they’re going to back AOC even though I’d guess she would get a lot of energy behind her.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Oh my fuck. God no. Stop. Please stop. What the actual fuck.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Are you fucking kidding me?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

People need to upvote this for visibility, not disagreement. Seems like most of us agree, fuck no.

People need to see what BS is coming.

But then again I'm just assuming that's how lemmy works and if we downvote it will get lost.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure leftists and 3rd party voters will be blamed again when she loses, again.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why? Jfc just learn for once.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 135 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We still have three years to go before the next election, assuming one actually happens.

At this stage in the game, the only thing that these types of polls are going to reveal is who has the most name recognition.

In other words, everyone calm down.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Just like the polls that show McDonald's, Taco Bell, or Chic fil a as America's favorite restaurant in X state. It doesn't take too many idiots to outweigh everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you! Any time this kind of polling shows up on Lemmy, users seem to think this is the Plan of the Democratic Leadership Cabal, rather than an incredibly premature name recognition test.

People want to vote for people they have favorable impressions of who they also think others will vote for. Without other frontrunners, who emerge over time, it's not surprising that polled Democrats would recognize and still support the candidate that 75 million people voted for five months ago.

If you want other candidates (I do), identify them and figure out how to help them build their profile now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's crazy how fast incredibly premature polling turns into unstoppable freight train that cannot be interrupted by anything but a certified act of God signed and dated with appropriate postage to oh shit oh God what's happening someone should have planned something.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm GLAD the Democrats are Pushing the Woman who LOST against a Billionaire Nazi who Campaigned on RUINING America and American Lives!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

She lost to a carnival barker

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Goddammitsomuch

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›