this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
681 points (99.6% liked)

politics

22305 readers
3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I never expected the US to go down this way...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Starlink makes sense on the top of mountain. If you have electricity from the grid, you should get fiber.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can starling even come close to the speed of fiber? I’m getting a gibabit a second for 50 bucks a month

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Nowhere close. Wireless anything needs to share a band across multiple devices. With fiber, you can either have an exclusive run to the service provider or, at the very least, to a connection point shared with some neighbors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Regardless of the obvious moneygrab corruption, It's not like the fiber program was ever going to work in the first place as long as private ISP's were involved.

Fiber backbone got installed along 25 miles of rural county highway out in the valley my parents live in. The company paid to do it marks the area as "service coming soon".
That was in 2018. The fiber is still dark with all the distribution boxes empty and not hooked up to anything, the only other options being $110/mo DSL in a very few select spots, a local mountaintop microwave wireless service that is basically turned off from November until April, or Starlink... and I'm guessing it'll forever remain that way until the coming collapse of the USA.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 week ago (5 children)

As someone that lives in the rural US and has no option for internet besides Starlink, I'd much rather have fiber. Starlink isn't bad, but it's garbage compared to fiber.

Plus I don't want to give Elmo my money. I really wish I had other options.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You’re lucky you get any channels besides Fox News. Keep complaining and you’ll go back to dialup ;) ;) ;)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fun fact: dialup is much better than cable in many countries.

Edit: oh no thats cat3 on DSL. Not dialup

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 183 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think the bigger headline should be the huge conflict of interest between Musk being a megadonor and "advisor" / leader of DOGE (depending on if you ask Trump or his minions) and being the CEO of Starlink owner SpaceX.

Add it to the list including lease of Starlink services and kits to the FAA.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's called crony capitalism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

In a just world they would be publicly executed for blatantly grifting 300million+ people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It sucks to even be in partial agreement with the broligarchs, but as a rural American, I have zero sympathy for this fuckhead or anyone else involved in the broadband fund.

The government has been pouring money into broadband expansion for decades, and for decades, internet providers have been sopping up that money while doing exactly nothing to actually earn it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

It's not all a story of failure, because there are numerous rural areas that have fiber now that did not before those programs. Some states have added on programs that boost the fiber adoption, like letting local phone and power companies roll out fiber on utility poles along the power lines. For example, I'm in a rural area and have 2 good options for fiber for about $50/mo with higher tier plans available.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, we could tell them to pay back the money, or force them to make upgrades. But, its easier to just award contracts to starlink.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

We certainly can't make them pay the money back. That could affect executive bonuses and stock plans as well corporate stock buybacks to drive up stock prices! Won't you think of the executives! ^/s^

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah there aren't any good guys to root for here.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is absolutely a far lesser of two evils here, though.

Comcast sucks, but they’re not actively dismantling our institutions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're too busy masturbating to the sound of us groaning at their hold music and screaming at their reps.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck Elon, but also fuck Comcast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›