this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
553 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

67002 readers
3739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

AI is essentially the human superid. No one man could ever be more knowledgeable. Being intelligent is a different matter.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Retropunk64@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] the_q@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Large language model. It's what all these AI really are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is hard to quantify. I use them constantly throughout my work day now.

Are they smarter than me? I'm not sure. Haven't thought too much about it.

What they certainly are, and by a long shot, is faster. Given a set of data, I could analyze it and pull out insights and conclusions. It might take me a week or a month depending on the size and breadth of the data set. An LLM can pull out insights and conclusions in seconds.

I can read error stacks coming from my code, but before I've even read the first few lines the LLM has ingested all of them, checked the code, and reached a conclusion about the necessary fix. Is it right, optimal, and avoid creating other bugs? Like 75% at this point. I can coax it, interate on the solution my self, or do it entirely myself with the understanding of the bug that it granted me. This same bug might have taken hours to figure out myself.

My point is, I'm not sure how to compare smarter vs orders of magnitude faster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is sad. This does not spark joy. We're months from someone using "but look, ChatGPT says..." To try to win an argument. I can't wait to spend the rest of my life explaining to people that LLMs are really fancy bullshit generator toys.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Already happened in my work. People swearing an API call exists because an LLM hallucinated it. Even as the people who wrote the backend tells them it does not exist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

Given the US adults I see on the internet, I would hazard a guess that they're right.

[–] interested_party@lemmy.org 2 points 3 days ago

It's probably true too.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

What a very unfortunate name for a university.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And you know what? The people who believe that are right.

Note that that’s not a commentary on the capabilities of LLMs.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

It's sad, but the old saying from George Carlin something along the lines of, "just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize that 50% are even worse..."

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I suppose some of that comes down to the personal understanding of what "smart" is.

I guess you could call some person, that doesn't understand a topic, but still manages to sound reasonable when talking about it, and might even convince people that they actually have a deep understanding of that topic, "smart", in a kind of "smart imposter".

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 31 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Half of all voters voted for Trump. So an LLM might be smarter than them. Even a bag of pea gravel might be.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Less than a third of all voters voted for Trump. Most voters stayed home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Viskio_Neta_Kafo@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

A bag of frozen peas's is smarter than some of these Trump followers. Even half a frozen pea is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Intelligence and knowledge are two different things. Or, rather, the difference between smart and stupid people is how they interpret the knowledge they acquire. Both can acquire knowledge, but stupid people come to wrong conclusions by misinterpreting the knowledge. Like LLMs, 40% of the time, apparently.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

My new mental model for LLMs is that they're like genius 4 year olds. They have huge amounts of information, and yet have little to no wisdom as to what to do with it or how to interpret it.

[–] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

LLM is proof that even if you're extremely stupid, having access to information can still make you sound smart.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I believe LLMs are smarter than half of US adults

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

The average literacy level is around that of a sixth grader.

This tracks

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is the problem with US adults. Half of them probably is dumber than AI.....

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

The grammatical error here is chef's kiss.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

That's called a self-proving statement.

[–] tad_lispy@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago

If we are talking about American adults, I guess they might be right.

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hallucination comes off as confidence. Very human like behavior tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago

Do the other half believe it is dumber than it actually is?

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow. Reading these comments so many people here really don't understand how LLMs work or what's actually going on at the frontier of the field.

I feel like there's going to be a cultural sonic boom, where when the shockwave finally catches up people are going to be woefully under prepared based on what they think they saw.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

AKA "future shock"

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Why are you even surprised at this point, when it comes to Americans ?

load more comments