this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
351 points (96.1% liked)

Asklemmy

48517 readers
643 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

(page 4) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

100%. I have not used google in about roughly 15 years. DDG has been my daily driver since 2010

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

For me they are even better than Google. But I use Qwant now.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

My thought always was that DDG was good to set as my default, and if I'm not happy with the results then it's not a big deal to use Google once in awhile.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not as good as google was when I was first allowed to use the internet 15+ years ago, but much better than today's google. Just so much more peace of mind to know that profit isn't what governs my search results.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It still kinda does, since it's Bing under the hood.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"just as good"? No, I feel it is (and has been for years) vastly superior but I mostly use it to find documentation or Stack Overflow answers so consistent UI and concise summaries are high priority to me. Take that as you will

I don't think anybody can dethrone Google Maps yet but that's another story

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I still haven't found Google to be worse than Bing yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've had to use !g way too much lately, so no.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Bangs, used to move the search to another site, in this case google

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

isn't it just a bing wrapper?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No and kinda yes. Duckduckgo has its own webcrawler, but also adds in results from other sources including Bing, Yahoo and others.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DDG does the job. Hopefully, I won't have to switch engines soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Wait 'til you learn that DDG's engine is Bing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just dont use ChatGPT but one of the other models. I find LLama to work fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wha... Why? Why gpt the only baddy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I trust DuckDuckGo. And I like they anonymize my AI queries. I feel like it’s the next best thing to running it locally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

"Trust me bro"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does their 'anonymizing queries' feat mean anything if they don't disclose how it works or what that even means literally?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί