this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43906 readers
1035 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it's actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that's really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The average Lemmy user knows fuck all about, security, privacy, operating systems, act like they are unique, and are inclusive despite wanting more people to understand more about the way they see things.

Libertarianism and anarchism aren't cool and don't work.

You are a part of the problem if you hate Nintendo but think you are helping the developer by pirating their games.

You are an even bigger problem to bringing more people to your way of thinking if you are constantly negative about those people buying something they like just because you wouldn't.

Thinking you are alternative because everything you think is mainstream makes you mainstream.

Your choice of FOSS and OS doesn't make that product good by design. Just because you can't operate and OS doesn't make that OS bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Euthanasia should be available for anyone at any age. You don't choose to be born, life has no inherent value, suffering is strictly personal. Suicide is a terrible option with lots of drama, an extremely high failure rate and lifelong treatments or medication that are seen as the solution by society is a conservative convulsion of keeping people alive under any circumstances.

We could set up three sessions with a therapist, to keep people from losing loved ones too fast. But honestly, to me that would feel patronizing. That other people find it important someone stays alive is their problem. If it hurts them too much they can do the same.

There is joy in life and that's beautiful, but on a scale suffering has the possibility to be more intense. Let people die without drama, let them say goodbye if they want with a ceremony, let them choose.

That's the next step in the mentality of a modern civilization. It will fix the drama of wars, hunger and pain as you always have a simple painless solution if the suffering gets too heavy. Just end it, peacefully, whenever you want.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's a very brave take, but I don't think I can agree with you 100 percent. Some people have depression (we think of it as a disease), and younger people tend to be.. immature that they make decisions impulsively and regretted their decisions later. Euthanasia is a one way road, there is of course no going back after you're dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

USA is an oligarchy. I can imagine americans disagree. But perhaps not lemmies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you're obese you should not be allowed to work in a health care related field.

I never can say this out loud, but it legitimately rubs me the wrong way.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I think it's something along the same vein as an overweight fitness instructor. I think it's an innate requisite that if someone is presenting as a professional, that has instructions for us to follow, that they at least have the appearance of following their own guidelines.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Movies and TV are boring. In the past two decades, there's been a small handful of stuff that's watchable, but most of the media is like, painfully boring.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Americans really think they own the world sometimes, and truly underestimate the disdain the world has for them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We really don't have disdain for the Americans. Most Americans I've met have been great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That is the opposite of unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People who are strongly against nuclear power are ignorant of the actual safety statistics and are harming our ability to sustainably transition off fossil fuels and into renewables.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel this would have been spot on, in the nineties.

Right now the problems plaguing nuclear are economic. There is no guarantee you can build and exploit a plant and get to break even before either it becomes irrelevant, or you fall victim to regulatory jostling.

Nuclear was a missed opportunity, but the window is closing fast and it will probably remain a missed opportunity forever.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not all Nuclear Power is equal. RBMK reactors are dangerous as fuck. Others not so much.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you take all operational nuclear reactors safety records into account from all countries in the world, including all meltdowns and near meltdown disasters, it's still by far safer and has resulted in less deaths and long term illness than any fossil fuel, on every single metric.

True that newer style reactors are far safer, but that's the point. If we had started to transition in the 70's into nuclear power, we would have made a massive dent in climate change and set the stage to transition into full clean renewable energy sources and along the way improved regulations and engineering standards for existing nuclear plants.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, BUT the risk isn't distributed like the rest. One Reactor could displace tens of millions of people, disrupt infrastructure, and cause devastating impact to the US economy. That's a lot of risk based on it's proximity. If they could build them in the middle of nowhere out west that could all be mitigated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not having kids because of climate change is stupid. You are leaving the world in the hands of people who care less than you.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll be dead before then and if I don't make offspring then so will anyone I care about. Y'all have fun destroying the planet lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's pretty much where I'm at. I'm not gonna rope more people into this mess voluntarily.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I upvoted because this contributes to the discussion of the question, but fuck you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dogs suck ass. All of them can go to hell. No one actually likes their dog or takes care of them as they should. I can not understand how anyone could want to handle man sizes poos on the regular, or listen to a single bark it's so annoying.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I find it insane that the same people who are anti-fossil fuel and want only green energy is also anti-nuclear power. I also want fossil fuels gone, but nuclear is the only way we are able to get to where we need to.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

wouldn't say this is an unpopular opinion. many people share your pov

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No word is inherently bad, it's all about what you mean and how you use it. Most people have a no-tolerance with a few words though.

For example, all words would be ok in educational purposes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this the part where someone just leaves a lone N as a comment?

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I would not downvote, but I would feel uncomfortable writing it myself :)

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't want mass-adoption of Lemmy by more Reddit users (said a former Reddit lurker who likes it here and actually participates because it's awesome at this stage).

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I greatly despise all facial hair.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Blaming slow drivers for your dangerous driving to pass them immediately and dangerously has the same energy as a rapist blaming what the victim was wearing: The other person made me do it. I have no agency over my own reactions.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Great Carlin quote about this. Have you ever noticed anyone going slower than you is an idiot and anyone faster a maniac?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I wouldn't pass dangerously it has to be said that a slow driver is definitely a hazard if they are significantly below the speed limit. Especially on a highway. Ive been caught behind someone doing 15 under and it is extremely scary as you hope everyone behond you see's you in time. In general speed differential causes accidents both in the case of people speeding and going under the limit.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Case and point: In your scenario, the danger comes from the speeding, inattentive drivers behind you, yet you have displaced the blame onto to the poor sap in a U-Haul box van with all of their stuff in it. What else might the speeding drivers not see in time? If they can't see a vehicle going 55MPH in front of them in time, what about stopped traffic?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said anyone was speeding I said the car in front of me was going 15 miles an hour under the limit, so even people going the limit will be coming up significantly faster than they expect. There's a reason some highways have a minimum speed limit. If you cannot operate a vehicle at least 5 below the speed limit you shouldn't be driving on that road. Also sudden slow downs in traffic literally cause accidents daily which is why we shouldn't be causing them when we have the ability not to.

You seem to think im defending speeding when all i am really saying is big deviations from the limit in either direction increase the chances of an accident exponentially.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy will die out without monotization such as every 6th post being an ad.

I love it but feel like libre projects that have constant maintenance costs beyond developers' time need to find ways to become mostly self sustainable without relying on donations. I also dont mind less than 20% of the posts being ads.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All you need to run a lemmy instance is a bit of time, a computer and an internet connection though, same as running any forum. The costs of all those are rapidly decreasing over time and are well within "eh who cares i'll just pay it" ranges; a smaller instance can easily be run for less than 5-10 bucks a month on the cloud, or for the cost of electricity if you have an old PC lying around.

A lot of costs of keeping servers running is employing people to do it; if its not too much hassle to keep one maintained, people will keep servers online.

Source: I run datacenters and support various cloud apps

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but it's not just 1 instance you have to worry about. For this to go well, dozens even hundreds of instances have to stay around. If we start losing large chunks of our history or some parts go down here and there it's not going to survive. This is my third account due to how many issues I was having posting weeks back with the different major instances being overloaded. Even then, most of the posts I'm interacting with are hosted there and from time to time there are errors.

Also Images are a huge burden.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ