this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1201 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66922 readers
4079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Of course it did, While we are at it, are there any programmes that aim to clean up space junk ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sat internet is so overhyped. As it's limited by physics cell towers will always outperform them. Simple as that.

  • cities - cables and 5g
  • country side - 4g and cables in high concentration areas
  • middle of nowhere or war zones - low orbit sats.

This is purely a security issue not a consumer one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Spoken like a true spoiled city person Good luck getting the necessary infrastructure built (cables, towers, et al) to really remote places. It's probably more expensive in the long run than having a satellite constellation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Idk i live in a country where we have wifi in some forests and free wifi in every large city. And we're an ex soviet shithole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Good luck? Most of the world is already there. I had 3g in deep jungles of Thailand last weekend and even in the most remote places in China have wire these days.

The main point is that sat is limited by physics so cell towers and wire are upgrades over sat so it makes much more sense to start with better technology now as we'll never need less connection.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (9 children)

And wires are not bound by physics? To run cables over such long distances you have to boost the signal at periodic distances to avoid voltage drops and noise

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Infrastructure can be a real problem in some places.

I'm currently on a mountain and since they upgraded to a hybrid satellite/cable system the speeds have skyrocketed. Laying cable/towers is just not viable, especially with dense rock peaks blocking line of sight.

Also I have coworkers in Nigeria who lose internet multiple times a day (and often don't have the bandwidth for a video call) but most of them have bitten the bullet and paid the high up-front cost to get starlink at home. And now can do HD video calls with zero interruption (unless they have power issues, but that's a whole other thing).

So I think there's a lot of use-cases for sattelite, especially for people who aren't considered worth the investment in non-sattelite infrastructure.

It's just unfortunate that yeah, space junk is going to one day (suddenly) be a massive problem.

Edit: ah I may have replied to the wrong comment

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

So much space junk….

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›