this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4091 readers
11 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

They really showed... someone?.. something?...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Government is fortunate that people aren't regularly rioting and burning buildings to the ground with the state the country is in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

This is Rigged has said it will continue to carry out similar actions until its demands are met. They include supermarkets reducing the price of baby formula to March 2021 prices and the Scottish government funding and implementing a community food hub for every 500 households in Scotland.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Come out Ye, Black and Tans"... more like "Come out Ye, Porridge and Jams", amiright?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Country gets worse every year.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

You should clarify whether that is because an increasing amount of people can't afford to feed themselves or because of a non violent protest.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's odd how people are willing to get upset over something like this yet turn a blind eye to Prince Andrew.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not sure people are turning a blind eye to it. Think you made that up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

How dare people be concerned with people being unable to afford food in a society with an ever increasing equality gap!

Let's get that nonce Prince Andrew sorted first and then worry about feeding the scum!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the most British act of vandalism ever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If that was true, they would have used marmite.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

They'd be there all day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that have been Australian?

Or is that vegemite?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Britain and Australia are two distant cousins separated by a planet but united in their love of that bitter black goop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Marmite is British and vegemite is Australian.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

this is a victimless crime that is also crimeless because it shouldn't be illegal

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

victimless crime

They damaged a statue that belongs to a publicly owned local museum...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

They poured what I eat for breakfast every morning on a chunk of stone. I think it'll be fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They put more history in it. That's practically a service to the museum, a value add. Ought to be commemorated for it, really.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They will be commemorated, by the prison system putting more history into them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

importing the yankee's hardon for punishment, i see

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm just using your logic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Treating things as things -> me, cool, historical

Treating people as things -> you, smuglord "logical"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Least deranged hexbear user

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah, bunch of useful idiots, bots, and shills spreading authoritarian propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Which is owned by the city, they damaged a statue owned by the city.

Big fucking deal mate. No one was actually hurt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So there was no victims ofJanuary 6th either because the capital building is publicly owned too?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You’re right, defacing a statue is the same as attempting insurrection, doubly so where people were assaulted or died.

That’s your fucking amazing retort is it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My retort is that "it's publicly owned so it's fine if anyone destroys it" is a stupid argument no matter who makes it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

It’s called nuance.

Not everything is exactly the same in the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

*they poured jam over a statue

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately the tittle misses. Spray painted cunt on the plinth and planned to glue themselves to it.

Jam and porridge has minimal victims yes. Someone has to pay to clean it. So I'd say clean up is a punishment that suits the crime.

Spray paint and glue gets a bit more complex. As clean up is a little more involved. And presents the risk of damaging the statue.

Unfortunately the concept of who the statue represents and current feelings towards her. Really do not relate to weather their is a victim or not. It is property be it tax payers or some wealthy plonk. Victims exist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yes, but defacing the statue of a royal is cool and good, and the more defaced it gets, the cooler and gooder. why clean it up? why erect it in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

To deface it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

I was on board with making a mess but i see where defacing property could be illegal.