this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
218 points (97.0% liked)

News

23167 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Three U.S. C-130 cargo planes dropped 66 total bundles, equating to about 38,000 pork-free meals, into the territory on Saturday morning. The bundles were split between three planes, the official said."

"The airdrop is expected to be the first of many announced by President Joe Biden on Friday. The aid will be coordinated with Jordan, which has also conducted airdrops to deliver food to Gaza."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So about 3% of a single day's need for food in Gaza. Guess the other 97% of Gazan's can starve.

Complete total "we'll helping Gazans, vote for me" bullshit from Biden.

Genocide-loving and a complete total hypocrite.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ambassador Robert Ford (retired) spent his entire diplomatic career in the Middle East and North Africa since 1985, including being appointed as Ambassador to Syria by Obama, and by Bush Jr as Ambassador to Algeria.

He’s dead right, and I don’t know how anybody is calling this a victory for anyone except the few mouths this limited aid can help. The whole world saw an American ”Strategic Ally” treat us the same as countries they went to war with several times.

Bretton Woods and the Pax Americana is starting to crumble, while the Global South is watching. This is an incredible display of US weakness on the global stage, not the ‘they/them army’ the alt-right pretends is an issue. Biden’s inability or unwillingness here is astounding - he can’t/won't pressure an “ally” to not starve civilians to death, while the international community looks for any American leadership to break the deadlock on the ground in Gaza and the UNSC.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Empires be like imtooweak.meme

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

So if I give an arsonist a can of gasoline and some matches, which he then uses to burn my neighbor's house down; and I then give my neighbor a PB&J... am I a good guy or bad guy?

Don't get me wrong - please don't stop sending the PB&Js, but could we please stop giving supplies to the fucking arsonist??

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Here's a guy named Steve, eating and reviewing one of these humanitarian rations, in case anyone was curious:

https://youtu.be/iKfWQ3Sij68

And with really good sound quality too, since they're also ASMR vids.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Well that was an interesting watch. He seems like a gem of a lad. Seemed to genuinely like the food and it did all sound appetising tbh.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Man.. Steve is a treasure.

Such a wonderful channel.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Please tell me those aren't fucking MAGAt hats. 🤦🏼‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't really see it clearly but my guess would be it's a unit hat. The military issues soldiers unit hats to wear as an alternative to normal headgear sometimes. It's a morale thing since the unit caps tend to be more like baseball caps than military headgear.

here is a shot of some air force civil engineers wearing their unit hats.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Army parachute riggers wear those red hats so they can be picked out of the crowd to assist paratroopers. It could be them or their equivalent in the Air Force, but I'm not sure if Air Force riggers wear the same hats or not.

The people in the photo are rigging the chutes on those pallets and are either Army or Air Force based on the camouflage pattern.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

38.000 For 400.000 people?

They're spending more on the media campaign for this than the airdrop itself

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How does the media in a capitalist country work...?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This guy notoriously believes (or posts like he believes) that all media is secretly controlled by the US government, which is in turn controlled by the Jews...it's uncomfortably close to and sometimes crosses the line

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Man, I thought they had a containment Instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

They do but that's not going to stop them from spamming other instances with BRICS propaganda leading up to the election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think you are seriously underestimating just how expensive the airdrops are. It’s not an adequate solution, but it is something that will help prevent some people from starving to death.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, yes, Palestinians are lucky to have US' help. If it wasn't for US, they could avoid genocide against them, but on the other hand they would miss these free goodies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

If only there was another less expensive way 🤔

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Spending millions of dollars of relief aid for the millions of dollars of genocidal actions they funded that caused for a need for relief aid in the first place.

This is like the Mafia sending you flowers in the hospital after they broke your knees.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Do you think that this genocide wouldn't have happened if thr US didn't supply weapons?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Literally yes. If Israel didn't have unconditional US support they'd have run out of bombs a long time ago. And probably gotten partitioned by their neighbors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No, they wouldn't have. Israel has an impressive military of its own.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We're all gonna die some day, that doesn't mean it's okay to murder.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying its okay to murder. Just you should focus your hate on the guys actually DOING the murdering not the person that sold them the weapons.

I'm not saying America is innocent just even if they didn't arm Israel, it woukdt really change anything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha. So if I read the comment right, in this case it probably isn't relevant that the US not selling the weapons would result in the same outcome.

I read the original comment as pointing out the hypocrisy in both providing aid whilst arming the attackers. As well as pointing out the commenters issues with the US being complicit in the attacks.

In my opinion, it doesn't matter if they would have done it anyway, the US is still guilty of being complicit regardless of how much aid they provide.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes the US still bares some guilt, but compared to the guilt the Israelis bare its inconsequential and not really worth the effort, because even if you managed to get the US to stop shipping weapons, it wouldn't stop thr genocide, so your effort is way better used trying to get the US to stop Israel from comiiting genocide, for example by not vetoing un resolutions.

Tldr there are better things to be at the US government about regarding this genocide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Agreed there are better things to be angry at.

Disagreed that the US guilt is inconsequential.

But these are just our opinions and we're allowed to have different ones :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Do you think that this genocide wouldn't have happened if [the] US didn't supply weapons?

It likely would've happened no matter what, but not on such a massive scale.

Edit: This might explain the downvotes. (NSFW - language)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

1000 lb bombs are expensive. Napalm is cheap though.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Food for Palestine! Bombs for Israel! We're helping stop the Genocide!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Tons of bombs for Israel, 1.5% of one day's food need for Gaza.

"See, we're the Good Guys!!!"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Any help is better than none, that's obvious. However, 38,000 meals is not NEARLY sufficient when the UN's humanitarian office lists 2.2 million Palestinians at Crisis or worse levels of food insecurity (stage 3 of 5), of which over 500,000 are at the Catastrophe level (stage 5, the most serious before death). So you can see it would take 14 drops of that size (and each meal would have to get to the right people) to feed only the over 500,000 most desperately starving people a single meal, much less a day's worth of food.

The same report says there is no access to clean water in northern Gaza. There is also a lack of medicine with hundreds of thousands of people dangerously ill.

The only remotely sustainable solution is to follow the advice humanitarian agencies have been giving this whole time - allow MANY more trucks into the region. There were about 500 aid trucks entering Gaza daily prior to Oct. 7th - since then it's very roughly 10-30% of that most days. If Biden and the rest of the Western powers actually want to turn this crisis around, they are going to have to pressure Israel to immediately open up crossings and stop interfering with aid delivery. I sincerely hope this is just the start of a much more concerted humanitarian effort than has been allowed. Otherwise I'm afraid these air drops will be little more than a political trick done so that people can say, "but look, we helped!"

load more comments
view more: next ›