this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

981 readers
286 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Archive link

The fee works out to an hourly rate of $288,888, according to the court filing.

What possible justification leads to $288,888 per hour lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The story notes recent sentiment of the Delaware Chancery Court regarding awards to legal teams taking on corporate abuse. Which sounds great. They're rewarding lawyers for taking risky cases against big corporate legal teams. With lawyers for the plaintiffs commonly being approved to receive 20-30% of the damages paid out.

None of that sounds off. It's just that this Tesla case involves a $56B dispute. The lawyers asked for a more standard 11% too. 11% of such a large amount means $6B.

Seems broken for sure for this case. But also I get the intent of the court here. Court will probably say hell no. But the lawyers shot their shot based off other recent settlements.