this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1457 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

6061 readers
1219 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1457
Murica (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Anons argue in comments

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Someone can probably do the math, but i have a hunch that humans are technically not very fuel efficient if you look at calories burned pr the total mass being moved along.

But whatever it is biking is awesome, but being technically correct is even better.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Quick math shows I am quite a bit more efficient than a Nissan Juke traveling 150 miles at 19mph. About 50kcal/pound for the car and 8kcal/pound for me+bike to travel the distance.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Humans are actually unusually energy efficient for mammals when walking and even more so when cycling. Here's a little info graphic showing a breakdown.

One thing to keep in mind if you have a dog is they're less energy efficient than humans. While dogs can run faster, a reasonably fit human can easily out distance an equally fit dog when walking or distance running.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Nice graphic. ~~But it seems like it doesn't factor in kg of mass moved. A human and a bike is a lot lighter than a car or a horse. You could also argue that the vehicle weigh should be ignored but then again you could easily argue back that weight of goods move can possibly be a lot higher with a car if you load it up to capacity~~. Ignore that. I did not see it said 5 riders for the car

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

"Just leave it anywhere there is a secure structure" - Yes, I see this regularly when I have to maneuver around bikes carelessly "parked" in the middle of the pedestrian walkway...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The one downside is that a lot of people I know have had some nasty accidents and broke a bone or something. Sure, in cars you are also at the risk of kissing a tree at highway speed, but bike accidents feel a lot more common and have a lot less protective metal involved

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I've known a few people killed in car accidents. I know lots of people who have had bike accidents, but none of them died, and the only ones with serious injuries were when they got hit by a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They might be inexpensive where you live. I've paid more than half of my paycheck for my bicycle, and it's one of cheaper ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Gift a man a bike, and he will ride for a year. Gift him bolt cutters, and he will ride forever.

Jokes aside, where are you? Here, good new bikes are ridiculously expensive, but if you know where to look and what to look for, used ones are cheap. You don't even have to deal with a shady dude in a back alley, a lot of municipalities etc. auction off bikes they confiscate, which are often a few hours of work away from being pretty okay

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›