this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1388 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

10935 readers
892 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

BuT wHeRe WouLd i PaRk mY cAr?!?!!?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That's the neat part, you don't.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah but then rich fucks wouldn’t have a place all to themselves to be rich fucks, so that’s a fuck you, poors, just be rich like us, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not for nothing, but this wouldn't fly in the USA. You'd need to replace most of those trees with roads.

Or better yet, reduce the number of housing units and keep the trees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You're probably not going to save 95% of the trees given the major earthworks likely needed for managing sewage, stormwater, and other utilities. You'll probably save most of them, though.

40k looks pretty optimistic for the size and number of buildings, too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

When there's no more golf you'll know the rich fucks are gone.

[–] [email protected] 182 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's also get rid of golf courses in arid deserts in the midst of droughts

[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You had me at "Let’s get rid of golf courses"

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

This is a municipal course as well, so Seattle could literally do this. The city government doesn't want to.

This heavily neglected sidewalk, next to the fenced off golf course, alongside a high speed and very busy highway onramp just 2 blocks from a light rail stop, tells you just how much the city cares about the area.

There is no excuse not to cleanup and widen this sidewalk except apathy and malaise from the city.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›